Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25520658›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2014

Evolving toward a human-cell based and multiscale approach to drug discovery for CNS disorders.

Eric E Schadt, Sean Buchanan, Kristen J Brennand, Kalpana M Merchant

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The genetics of bipolar disorder.Molecular psychiatry · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. High content analysis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Molecular and cellular neurosciences · 2017
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric E SchadtIcahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, NY, USA ; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, NY, USA.
Sean BuchananLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Kristen J BrennandDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, NY, USA.
Kalpana M MerchantLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

Integrative Network Biology Approaches to Identify, Characterize and Validate Molecular Subtypes in Alzheimer's DiseaseU01AG046170 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI WANG, MINGHUI, ZHANG, BIN · 2013 to 2022
$26.0M
Contrasting causal microRNAs in forebrain and midbrain COS hiPSC neural cellsR01MH101454 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BRENNAND, KRISTEN JENNIFER · 2013 to 2017
$2.8M
1/3-Networks from Multidimensional Data for Schizophrenia and Related DisordersR01MH097276 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SCHADT, ERIC E, SKLAR, PAMELA · 2012 to 2014
$2.5M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG046170NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097276NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A disruptive approach to therapeutic discovery and development is required in order to significantly improve the success rate of drug discovery for central nervous system (CNS) disorders. In this review, we first assess the key factors contributing to the frequent clinical failures for novel drugs. Second, we discuss cancer translational research paradigms that addressed key issues in drug discovery and development and have resulted in delivering drugs with significantly improved outcomes for patients. Finally, we discuss two emerging technologies that could improve the success rate of CNS therapies: human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-based studies and multiscale biology models. Coincident with advances in cellular technologies that enable the generation of hiPSCs directly from patient blood or skin cells, together with methods to differentiate these hiPSC lines into specific neural cell types relevant to neurological disease, it is also now possible to combine data from large-scale forward genetics and post-mortem global epigenetic and expression studies in order to generate novel predictive models. The application of systems biology approaches to account for the multiscale nature of different data types, from genetic to molecular and cellular to clinical, can lead to new insights into human diseases that are emergent properties of biological networks, not the result of changes to single genes. Such studies have demonstrated the heterogeneity in etiological pathways and the need for studies on model systems that are patient-derived and thereby recapitulate neurological disease pathways with higher fidelity. In the context of two common and presumably representative neurological diseases, the neurodegenerative disease Alzheimer's Disease, and the psychiatric disorder schizophrenia, we propose the need for, and exemplify the impact of, a multiscale biology approach that can integrate panomic, clinical, imaging, and literature data in order to construct predictive disease network models that can (i) elucidate subtypes of syndromic diseases, (ii) provide insights into disease networks and targets and (iii) facilitate a novel drug screening strategy using patient-derived hiPSCs to discover novel therapeutics for CNS disorders.

Indexed as

complex disease mechanismdrug discovery screeninghigh throughput biologystem cell-based screeningsystems biology and network biology

Identifiers

PMID25520658
PMCPMC4251289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.