Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25520619›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2014

Differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into striatal projection neurons: a pure MSN fate may not be sufficient.

Amy E Reddington, Anne E Rosser, Stephen B Dunnett

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. From Progenitors to Progeny: Shaping Striatal Circuit Development and Function.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Pluripotent stem cells progressing to the clinic.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2016
    Review
  11. Stem cell therapy: medico-legal perspectives in Italy.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy E ReddingtonThe Brain Repair Group, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University Cardiff, UK.
Anne E RosserThe Brain Repair Group, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University Cardiff, UK ; Department of Psychological Medicine and Neurology, Cardiff University Cardiff, UK.
Stephen B DunnettThe Brain Repair Group, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University Cardiff, UK.
Cardiff University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001257Medical Research Council MR/L010305/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Huntington's disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder leading to the loss inter alia of DARPP-32 positive medium spiny projection neurons ("MSNs") in the striatum. There is no known cure for HD but the relative specificity of cell loss early in the disease has made cell replacement by neural transplantation an attractive therapeutic possibility. Transplantation of human fetal striatal precursor cells has shown "proof-of-principle" in clinical trials; however, the practical and ethical difficulties associated with sourcing fetal tissues have stimulated the need to identify alternative source(s) of donor cells that are more readily available and more suitable for standardization. We now have available the first generation of protocols to generate DARPP-32 positive MSN-like neurons from pluripotent stem cells and these have been successfully grafted into animal models of HD. However, whether these grafts can provide stable functional recovery to the level that can regularly be achieved with primary fetal striatal grafts remains to be demonstrated. Of particular concern, primary fetal striatal grafts are not homogenous; they contain not only the MSN subpopulation of striatal projection neurons but also include all the different cell types that make up the mature striatum, such as the multiple populations of striatal interneurons and striatal glia, and which certainly contribute to normal striatal function. By contrast, present protocols for pluripotent stem cell differentiation are almost entirely targeted at specifying just neurons of an MSN lineage. So far, evidence for the functionality and integration of stem-cell derived grafts is correspondingly limited. Indeed, consideration of the features of full striatal reconstruction that is achieved with primary fetal striatal grafts suggests that optimal success of the next generations of stem cell-derived replacement therapy in HD will require that graft protocols be developed to allow inclusion of multiple striatal cell types, such as interneurons and/or glia. Almost certainly, therefore, more sophisticated differentiation protocols will be necessary, over and above replacement of a specific population of MSNs. A rational solution to this technical challenge requires that we re-address the underlying question-what constitutes a functional striatal graft?

Indexed as

embryonic stem cellsHuntington’s diseaseiPS cellsmedium spiny neuronsneuronal transplantationpluripotent stem cell graftsstriatal fatestriatal grafts

Identifiers

PMID25520619
PMCPMC4251433
OpenAlexW2143019545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.