Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25520611›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2014

Neural pathways for visual speech perception.

Lynne E Bernstein, Einat Liebenthal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phonological Representations of Auditory and Visual Speech in the Occipito-temporal Cortex and Beyond.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Contribution of Motion-Sensitive Brain Areas to Visual Speech Recognition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Inhibitory TMS over Visual Area V5/MT Disrupts Visual Speech Recognition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lynne E BernsteinDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, George Washington University Washington, DC, USA.
Einat LiebenthalDepartment of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee, WI, USA ; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Neurophysiological Basis of Speech PerceptionR01DC006287 · NIDCD · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI LIEBENTHAL, EINAT · 2003 to 2013
$3.4M
Multisensory Processing: Plasticity & Accommodation to a Sensory ProsthesisR01DC008308 · NIDCD · HOUSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BERNSTEIN, LYNNE ESTHER · 2006 to 2010
$2.0M
Visual Speech Perception and Neural ProcessingR01DC008583 · NIDCD · HOUSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BERNSTEIN, LYNNE ESTHER · 2007 to 2010
$1.4M
Visual Speech Perception and Neural ProcessingR55DC008583 · NIDCD · HOUSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BERNSTEIN, LYNNE ESTHER · 2007 to 2007
$100k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006287NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008308NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008583NIDCD NIH HHS R55 DC008583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the questions, what levels of speech can be perceived visually, and how is visual speech represented by the brain? Review of the literature leads to the conclusions that every level of psycholinguistic speech structure (i.e., phonetic features, phonemes, syllables, words, and prosody) can be perceived visually, although individuals differ in their abilities to do so; and that there are visual modality-specific representations of speech qua speech in higher-level vision brain areas. That is, the visual system represents the modal patterns of visual speech. The suggestion that the auditory speech pathway receives and represents visual speech is examined in light of neuroimaging evidence on the auditory speech pathways. We outline the generally agreed-upon organization of the visual ventral and dorsal pathways and examine several types of visual processing that might be related to speech through those pathways, specifically, face and body, orthography, and sign language processing. In this context, we examine the visual speech processing literature, which reveals widespread diverse patterns of activity in posterior temporal cortices in response to visual speech stimuli. We outline a model of the visual and auditory speech pathways and make several suggestions: (1) The visual perception of speech relies on visual pathway representations of speech qua speech. (2) A proposed site of these representations, the temporal visual speech area (TVSA) has been demonstrated in posterior temporal cortex, ventral and posterior to multisensory posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS). (3) Given that visual speech has dynamic and configural features, its representations in feedforward visual pathways are expected to integrate these features, possibly in TVSA.

Indexed as

audiovisual processingfunctional organizationlipreadingspeech perceptionvisual processing

Identifiers

PMID25520611
PMCPMC4248808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.