Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25520553›Full record

ArticleCancer informatics2014

Semantically linking in silico cancer models.

David Johnson, Anthony J Connor, Steve McKeever, Zhihui Wang, Thomas S Deisboeck, Tom Quaiser, Eliezer Shochat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Challenges in Using a Graph Database to Represent and Analyze Mappings of Cancer Study Data Standards.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David JohnsonDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK. ; Data Science Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anthony J ConnorDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Steve McKeeverDepartment of Informatics and Media, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. ; St. Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics (ITMO), St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Zhihui WangDepartment of Pathology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Thomas S DeisboeckHarvard-MIT (HST) Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Tom QuaiserRoche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center, Penzberg, Germany.
Eliezer ShochatRoche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiscale models are commonplace in cancer modeling, where individual models acting on different biological scales are combined within a single, cohesive modeling framework. However, model composition gives rise to challenges in understanding interfaces and interactions between them. Based on specific domain expertise, typically these computational models are developed by separate research groups using different methodologies, programming languages, and parameters. This paper introduces a graph-based model for semantically linking computational cancer models via domain graphs that can help us better understand and explore combinations of models spanning multiple biological scales. We take the data model encoded by TumorML, an XML-based markup language for storing cancer models in online repositories, and transpose its model description elements into a graph-based representation. By taking such an approach, we can link domain models, such as controlled vocabularies, taxonomic schemes, and ontologies, with cancer model descriptions to better understand and explore relationships between models. The union of these graphs creates a connected property graph that links cancer models by categorizations, by computational compatibility, and by semantic interoperability, yielding a framework in which opportunities for exploration and discovery of combinations of models become possible.

Indexed as

in silico oncologymodel explorationneo4jproperty graphstumor modeling

Identifiers

PMID25520553
PMCPMC4260769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.