Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25520506›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2015

Improving neutralization potency and breadth by combining broadly reactive HIV-1 antibodies targeting major neutralization epitopes.

Rui Kong, Mark K Louder, Kshitij Wagh, Robert T Bailer, Allan deCamp, Kelli Greene, Hongmei Gao, Justin D Taft, Anna Gazumyan, Cassie Liu and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Monoclonal Antibodies as Long-Acting Products: What Are We Learning From Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rui KongVaccine Research Center, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Mark K LouderVaccine Research Center, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Kshitij WaghTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
Robert T BailerVaccine Research Center, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Allan deCampFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kelli GreeneDepartments of Surgery and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Hongmei GaoDepartments of Surgery and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Justin D TaftVaccine Research Center, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Anna GazumyanLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA.
Cassie LiuLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA.
Michel C NussenzweigLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA.
Bette KorberTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
David C MontefioriDepartments of Surgery and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA monte@duke.edu jmascola@nih.gov.
John R MascolaVaccine Research Center, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA monte@duke.edu jmascola@nih.gov.
Duke Medical Center · USRockefeller University · USLos Alamos National Laboratory · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

Virus biology scientific research support componentUM1AI100645 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SANTRA, SAMPA · 2012 to 2018
$204.7M
Isolation of Monoclonal Antiobodies Against HIVZIAAI005095 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI DORIA-ROSE, NICOLE · 2009 to 2025
$14.5M
Intramural NIH HHSNIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI100645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe isolation of broadly neutralizing HIV-1 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to distinct epitopes on the viral envelope glycoprotein (Env) provides the potential to use combinations of MAbs for prevention and treatment of HIV-1 infection. Since many of these MAbs have been isolated in the last few years, the potency and breadth of MAb combinations have not been well characterized. In two parallel experiments, we examined the in vitro neutralizing activities of double-, triple-, and quadruple-MAb combinations targeting four distinct epitopes, including the CD4-binding site, the V1V2-glycan region, the V3-glycan supersite, and the gp41 membrane-proximal external region (MPER), using a panel of 125 Env-pseudotyped viruses. All MAb combinations showed substantially improved neutralization breadth compared to the corresponding single MAbs, while the neutralization potency of individual MAbs was maintained. At a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) cutoff of 1 μg/ml per antibody, double-MAb combinations neutralized 89 to 98% of viruses, and triple combinations neutralized 98 to 100%. Overall, the improvement of neutralization breadth was closely predicted by an additive-effect model and explained by complementary neutralization profiles of antibodies recognizing distinct epitopes. Subtle but consistent favorable interactions were observed in some MAb combinations, whereas less favorable interactions were observed on a small subset of viruses that are highly sensitive to V3-glycan MAbs. These data demonstrate favorable in vitro combinations of broadly neutralizing HIV-1 MAbs and suggest that such combinations could have utility for HIV-1 prevention and treatment. IMPORTANCE: Over the last 5 years, numerous broadly reactive HIV-1-neutralizing MAbs have been isolated from B cells of HIV-1-infected donors. Each of these MAbs binds to one of the major vulnerable sites (epitopes) on the surface of the viral envelope glycoprotein. Since antibodies to distinct viral epitopes could theoretically act together to provide greater potency and breadth of virus neutralization, we tested physical mixtures of double, triple, and quadruple combinations of neutralizing MAbs targeting four major epitopes on HIV-1 Env. When tested together, antibody combinations showed substantially improved neutralization breadth compared to single MAbs. This improvement could be explained by the complementary neutralization profiles of individual MAbs. We further demonstrated that each antibody maintained its full neutralization potency when used in combination with other MAbs. These data provide a rationale for clinical use of antibody-based combinations for HIV-1 prevention and therapy.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingAnti-HIV AgentsDrug InteractionsEpitopesHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHumansInhibitory Concentration 50Neutralization TestsAntibodies, NeutralizingAnti-HIV AgentsEpitopesHIV Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID25520506
PMCPMC4325730
OpenAlexW1994933959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.