Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25520434›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

The effect of face inversion for neurons inside and outside fMRI-defined face-selective cortical regions.

Jessica Taubert, Goedele Van Belle, Wim Vanduffel, Bruno Rossion, Rufin Vogels

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mapping macaque to human cortex with natural scene responses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. What does a "face cell" want?'Progress in neurobiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Parallel Processing of Facial Expression and Head Orientation in the Macaque Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jessica TaubertPsychological Sciences Research Institute and Neuroscience Institute, University of Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium; Laboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; jessica.taubert@uclouvain.be.
Goedele Van BellePsychological Sciences Research Institute and Neuroscience Institute, University of Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium;
Wim VanduffelLaboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; MGH Martinos Center, Charlestown, Massachusetts; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Bruno RossionPsychological Sciences Research Institute and Neuroscience Institute, University of Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium;
Rufin VogelsLaboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely believed that face processing in the primate brain occurs in a network of category-selective cortical regions. Combined functional MRI (fMRI)-single-cell recording studies in macaques have identified high concentrations of neurons that respond more to faces than objects within face-selective patches. However, cells with a preference for faces over objects are also found scattered throughout inferior temporal (IT) cortex, raising the question whether face-selective cells inside and outside of the face patches differ functionally. Here, we compare the properties of face-selective cells inside and outside of face-selective patches in the IT cortex by means of an image manipulation that reliably disrupts behavior toward face processing: inversion. We recorded IT neurons from two fMRI-defined face-patches (ML and AL) and a region outside of the face patches (herein labeled OUT) during upright and inverted face stimulation. Overall, turning faces upside down reduced the firing rate of face-selective cells. However, there were differences among the recording regions. First, the reduced neuronal response for inverted faces was independent of stimulus position, relative to fixation, in the face-selective patches (ML and AL) only. Additionally, the effect of inversion for face-selective cells in ML, but not those in AL or OUT, was impervious to whether the neurons were initially searched for using upright or inverted stimuli. Collectively, these results show that face-selective cells differ in their functional characteristics depending on their anatomicofunctional location, suggesting that upright faces are preferably coded by face-selective cells inside but not outside of the fMRI-defined face-selective regions of the posterior IT cortex.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualAnimalsBrain MappingFaceMacaca mulattaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuronsTemporal Lobeelectrophysiologyface representationsface-selective cellsinversion effectIT cortex

Identifiers

PMID25520434
PMCPMC4346728
OpenAlexW2037971054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.