Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25520392›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2015

Longitudinal noninvasive imaging of progesterone receptor as a predictive biomarker of tumor responsiveness to estrogen deprivation therapy.

Szeman Ruby Chan, Amy M Fowler, Julie A Allen, Dong Zhou, Carmen S Dence, Terry L Sharp, Nicole M Fettig, Farrokh Dehdashti, John A Katzenellenbogen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. PET Imaging of Estrogen Receptors UsingMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Mars Shot for Nuclear Medicine, Molecular Imaging, and Molecularly Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Recent Advances in Imaging Steroid Hormone Receptors in Breast Cancer.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Sensitivity and Isoform Specificity ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Radiology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review: Receptor Targeted Nuclear Imaging of Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  18. Imaging Diagnostic and Therapeutic Targets: Steroid Receptors in Breast Cancer.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2016
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Szeman Ruby ChanDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. schan@pathology.wustl.edu jkatzene@illinois.edu.
Amy M FowlerDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Julie A AllenDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Dong ZhouDivision of Radiological Sciences, Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Carmen S DenceDivision of Radiological Sciences, Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Terry L SharpDivision of Radiological Sciences, Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Nicole M FettigDivision of Radiological Sciences, Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Farrokh DehdashtiDivision of Radiological Sciences, Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
John A KatzenellenbogenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois. schan@pathology.wustl.edu jkatzene@illinois.edu.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AIMEE S JAMES · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
RATIONAL DESIGN OF BREAST TUMOR IMAGING AGENTSR01CA025836 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI KATZENELLENBOGEN, JOHN A. · 1985 to 2017
$4.2M
Translational Insights into Estrogen Receptor alpha-Positive Luminal Breast CanceU01CA141541 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CARDIFF, ROBERT D, SCHREIBER, ROBERT DAVID · 2009 to 2013
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS R01 CA025836NCI NIH HHS R01CA25836NCI NIH HHS U01 CA141541NCI NIH HHS U01CA141541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate whether longitudinal functional PET imaging of mammary tumors using the radiopharmaceuticals [(18)F]FDG (to measure glucose uptake), [(18)F]FES [to measure estrogen receptor (ER) levels], or [(18)F]FFNP [to measure progesterone receptor (PgR) levels] is predictive of response to estrogen-deprivation therapy. EXPERIMENTAL

design[(18)F]FDG, [(18)F]FES, and [(18)F]FFNP uptake in endocrine-sensitive and -resistant mammary tumors was quantified serially by PET before ovariectomy or estrogen withdrawal in mice, and on days 3 and 4 after estrogen-deprivation therapy. Specificity of [(18)F]FFNP uptake in ERα(+) mammary tumors was determined by competition assay using unlabeled ligands for PgR or glucocorticoid receptor (GR). PgR expression was also assayed by immunohistochemistry (IHC).

resultsThe levels of [(18)F]FES and [(18)F]FDG tumor uptake remained unchanged in endocrine-sensitive tumors after estrogen-deprivation therapy compared with those at pretreatment. In contrast, estrogen-deprivation therapy led to a reduction in PgR expression and [(18)F]FFNP uptake in endocrine-sensitive tumors, but not in endocrine-resistant tumors, as early as 3 days after treatment; the changes in PgR levels were confirmed by IHC. Unlabeled PgR ligand R5020 but not GR ligand dexamethasone blocked [(18)F]FFNP tumor uptake, indicating that [(18)F]FFNP bound specifically to PgR. Therefore, a reduction in FFNP tumor to muscle ratio in mammary tumors predicts sensitivity to estrogen-deprivation therapy.

conclusionsMonitoring the acute changes in ERα activity by measuring [(18)F]FFNP uptake in mammary tumors predicts tumor response to estrogen-deprivation therapy. Longitudinal noninvasive PET imaging using [(18)F]FFNP is a robust and effective approach to predict tumor responsiveness to endocrine treatment.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkersBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDiagnostic ImagingDisease Models, AnimalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLigandsMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMicePositron-Emission TomographyAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkersESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaFluorodeoxyglucose F18LigandsPromegestoneReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID25520392
PMCPMC4348221
OpenAlexW2002054163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.