ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015
How much does nasal cavity morphology matter? Patterns and rates of olfactory airflow in phyllostomid bats.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights into cranial anatomy and craniometry of the aardwolf (Proteles cristata) with comparisons to extant hyaenids.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Article
- Prenatal growth patterns of the upper jaw complex with implications for laryngeal echolocation in bats.Journal of anatomy · 2025Article
- Domestic cat nose functions as a highly efficient coiled parallel gas chromatograph.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Computational fluid dynamics comparison of the upper airway velocity, pressure, and resistance in cats using an endotracheal tube or a supraglottic airway device.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Analyses on the influence of normal nasal morphological variations on odorant transport to the olfactory cleft.Inhalation toxicology · 2022Article
- Computational Analysis of Olfactory Airspace in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2021Article
- Olfactory tracking strategies in a neotropical fruit bat.The Journal of experimental biology · 2021Article
- Role of nasal vestibule morphological variations on olfactory airflow dynamics.Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2021Article
- Role of ecology in shaping external nasal morphology in bats and implications for olfactory tracking.PloS one · 2020Article
- Vomeronasal and Olfactory Structures in Bats Revealed by DiceCT Clarify Genetic Evidence of Function.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2018Article
- Role of ortho-retronasal olfaction in mammalian cortical evolution.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The morphology of the nasal cavity in mammals with a good sense of smell includes features that are thought to improve olfactory airflow, such as a dorsal conduit that delivers odours quickly to the olfactory mucosa, an enlarged olfactory recess at the back of the airway, and a clear separation of the olfactory and respiratory regions of the nose. The link between these features and having a good sense of smell has been established by functional examinations of a handful of distantly related mammalian species. In this paper, we provide the first detailed examination of olfactory airflow in a group of closely related species that nevertheless vary in their sense of smell. We study six species of phyllostomid bats that have different airway morphologies and foraging ecologies, which have been linked to differences in olfactory ability or reliance. We hypothesize that differences in morphology correlate with differences in the patterns and rates of airflow, which in turn are consistent with dietary differences. To compare species, we make qualitative and quantitative comparisons of the patterns and rates of airflow through the olfactory region during both inhalation and exhalation across the six species. Contrary to our expectations, we find no clear differences among species in either the patterns of airflow through the airway or in rates of flow through the olfactory region. By and large, olfactory airflow seems to be conserved across species, suggesting that morphological differences appear to be driven by other mechanical demands on the snout, such as breathing and feeding. Olfactory ability may depend on other aspects of the system, such as the neurobiological processing of odours that work within the existing morphology imposed by other functional demands on the nasal cavity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.