Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2015
Oral glucose in preterm neonates during oropharyngeal suctioning: a randomized controlled cross-over trial.
Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions for endotracheal suctioning pain in preterm infants: A systematic review.Nursing open · 2023Pooled it
- First Brazilian recommendation on physiotherapy with sensory motor stimulation in newborns and infants in the intensive care unit.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensivaPooled it
- Effects of a less invasive suction protocol on pain and physiological stability in preterm infants receiving non-ınvasive ventilation: a randomized controlled trial.BMC pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Summary and Analysis of Relevant Evidence for Nondrug Nursing Programs in Neonatal Operational Pain Management.Emergency medicine international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledTo investigate whether orally applied glucose reduces pain response during oropharyngeal suctioning in preterm infants with a birth weight >1500 g, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial on 32 preterm infants undergoing oropharyngeal suctioning while on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score was assessed and compared in a cross-over design to investigate whether there was a significant difference in the patients' pain response. The mean PIPP score during oropharyngeal suctioning after placebo was 8.6 (KI 7.8-9.4). After glucose administration, the mean PIPP score was 8.0 (KI 7.1-8.9). Comparison of the treatment effects reached no statistic significance (p = 0.23). During the oral study drug administration during nasal CPAP, we observed 47 adverse events, but none necessitated therapeutic intervention and none was classified as serious.
conclusionIn our study, late preterm infants in the first days of life did not benefit significantly from analgesia with glucose during oropharyngeal suctioning. The oral administration of glucose under nasal CPAP led to no serious adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.