Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25519481›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2014

Extension of the primary care research object model (PCROM) as clinical research information model (CRIM) for the "learning healthcare system".

Wolfgang Kuchinke, Töresin Karakoyun, Christian Ohmann, Theodoros N Arvanitis, Adel Taweel, Brendan C Delaney, Stuart M Speedie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wolfgang KuchinkeHeinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany. kuchinkw@uni-duesseldorf.de.
Töresin KarakoyunHeinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany. toeresin.karakoyun@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Christian OhmannHeinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany. Christian.Ohmann@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Theodoros N ArvanitisUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, UK. t.arvanitis@warwick.ac.uk.
Adel TaweelKing's College London, London, UK. adel.taweel@kcl.ac.uk.
Brendan C DelaneyKing's College London, London, UK. brendan.delaney@kcl.ac.uk.
Stuart M SpeedieUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA. speed002@umn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient data from general practices is already used for many types of epidemiological research and increasingly, primary care systems to facilitate randomized clinical trials. The EU funded project TRANSFoRm aims to create a "Learning Healthcare System" at a European level that is able to support all types of research using primary care data, to recruit patients and follow patients in clinical studies and to improve diagnosis and therapy. The implementation of such a Learning Healthcare System needs an information model for clinical research (CRIM), as an informational backbone to integrate aspects of primary care with clinical trials and database searches.

methodsWorkflow descriptions and corresponding data objects of two clinical use cases (Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease and Type 2 Diabetes) were described in UML activity diagrams. The components of activity diagrams were mapped to information objects of PCROM (Primary Care Research Object Model) and BRIDG (Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group) and evaluated. The class diagram of PCROM was adapted to comply with workflow descriptions.

resultsThe suitability of PCROM, a primary care information model already used for clinical trials, to act as an information model for TRANSFoRm was evaluated and resulted in its extension with 14 new information object types, two extensions of existing objects and the introduction of two new high-ranking concepts (CARE area and ENTRY area). No PCROM component was redundant. Our result illustrates that in primary care based research an important but underestimated portion of research activity takes place in the area of care (e.g. patient consultation, screening, recruitment and response to adverse events). The newly introduced CARE area for care-related research activities accounts for this shift and includes Episode of Care and Encounter as two new basic elements. In the ENTRY area different aspects of data collection were combined, including data semantics for observations, assessment activities, intervention activities and patient reporting to enable case report form (CRF) based data collection combined with decision support.

conclusionsResearch with primary care data needs an extended information model that covers research activities at the care site which are characteristic for primary care based research and the requirements of the complicated data collection processes.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic Research DesignBiomedical ResearchData CollectionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Electronic Health RecordsEuropeEuropean UnionGastroesophageal RefluxHumansMedical Record LinkageModels, OrganizationalModels, TheoreticalPatient SelectionPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID25519481
PMCPMC4276023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.