Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25519425›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2015

The use of self-gripping (Progrip™) mesh during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: a prospective feasibility and long-term outcomes study.

Erin Bresnahan, Andrew Bates, Andrew Wu, Mark Reiner, Brian Jacob

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02712827 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Short Term Outcomes of Self-gripping (Progrip) Mesh With Fibrin Glue Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) Inguinal Hernia Repair

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2016 to 2018Enrolled150ConditionsHernia, InguinalArmsProgrip, Non-Progrip
NCT03564535 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Mesh Fixation With Tackers to Use of Self Fixating Mesh in Total Extra Peritoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, BhubaneswarRan2018 to 2021Enrolled112ConditionsInguinal Hernia, AdultArmsSelf fixating group, Tacker fixation group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with or without fixation leads to similar results. Outcome of randomized prospective trial.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2020
    Article
  6. Fixation techniques in inguinal hernia repair, what is really new?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Laparoscopic Single-Site Inguinal Hernia Repair Using a Self-Fixating Mesh.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin BresnahanDepartment of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, USA.
Andrew Bates
Andrew Wu
Mark Reiner
Brian Jacob
Mount Sinai Medical Center · USMount Sinai Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of self-gripping mesh during laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repairs may eliminate the need for any additional fixation, and thus reduce post-operative pain without the added concern for mesh migration. Long-term outcomes are not yet prospectively studied in a controlled fashion.

methodsUnder IRB approval, from January 2011-April 2013, 91 hernias were repaired laparoscopically with self-gripping mesh without additional fixation. Patients were followed for at least 1 year. Demographics and intraoperative data (defect location, size, and mesh deployment time) are recorded. VAS is used in the recovery room (RR) to score pain, and the Carolinas Comfort Scale ™ (CCS), a validated 0-5 pain/quality of life (QoL) score where a mean score of >1.0 means symptomatic pain, is employed at 2 weeks and at 1 year. Morbidities, narcotic usage, days to full activity and return to work, and CCS scores are reported.

resultsSixty two patients, with 91 hernias repaired with self-gripping mesh, completed follow-up at a mean time period of 14.8 months. Seventeen hernias were direct defects (average size 3.0 cm). Mesh deployment time was 193.7 s. RR pain was 1.1/10 using a VAS. Total average oxycodone/acetaminophen (5 mg/325 mg) usage = 5.0 tablets, days to full activity was 1.6, and return to work was 4.2 days. Thirteen small asymptomatic seromas were palpated without any recurrences or groin tenderness, and all seromas resolved by the 6 month visit. Transient testis discomfort was reported in five patients. Urinary retention was 3.2%. Mean CCS™ scores at the first visit for groin pain laying, bending, sitting, walking, and step-climbing were 0.2, 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, and 0.3, respectively. At the first post op visit, 4.8% had symptomatic pain (CCS > 1). At 14.8 months, no patients reported symptomatic pain with CCS scores for all 62 patients averaging 0.02, (range 0-0.43). There are no recurrences thus far.

conclusionsSelf-gripping mesh can be safely used during laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repairs; our cohort had a rapid recovery, and at the 1-year follow-up visit, there were no recurrences and no patients reported any chronic pain as defined by a CCS™ > 1.

Indexed as

Surgical MeshAdolescentAdultAgedChronic PainFeasibility StudiesFemaleHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PainProspective StudiesQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID25519425
OpenAlexW2034476386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.