Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25519339›Full record

ArticleBMC proceedings2014

Prediction of genetic contributions to complex traits using whole genome sequencing data.

Chen Yao, Ning Leng, Kent A Weigel, Kristine E Lee, Corinne D Engelman, Kristin J Meyers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC proceedings, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chen YaoDepartment of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, 1675 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Ning LengDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, 1220 Medical Sciences Center, 1300 University Ave, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Kent A WeigelDepartment of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, 1675 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Kristine E LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin Medical School, 1069 WARF Building, 610 North Walnut Street, Madison, WI 53726, USA.
Corinne D EngelmanDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI53726, USA.
Kristin J MeyersDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin Medical School, 1069 WARF Building, 610 North Walnut Street, Madison, WI 53726, USA.

Funding

GENETIC ANALYSIS OF COMMON DISEASES: AN EVALUATIONR01GM031575 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY · PI ALMASY, LAURA A. · 1985 to 2016
$7.8M
Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD047873 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Katherine J. Curtis · 2014 to 2026
$5.1M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD047873NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM031575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although markers identified by genome-wide association studies have individually strong statistical significance, their performance in prediction remains limited. Our goal was to use animal breeding genomic prediction models to predict additive genetic contributions for systolic blood pressure (SBP) using whole genome sequencing data with different validation designs. The additive genetic contributions of SBP were estimated via linear mixed model. Rare variants (MAF<0.05) were collapsed through the k-means method to create a "collapsed single-nucleotide polymorphisms." Prediction of the additive genomic contributions of SBP was conducted using genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (GBLUP) and BayesCπ. Estimates of predictive accuracy were compared using common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) versus common and collapsed SNPs, and for prediction within and across families. The additive genetic variance of SBP contributed to 18% of the phenotypic variance (h(2) = 0.18). BayesCπ had slightly better prediction accuracies than GBLUP. In both models, within-family predictions had higher accuracies both in the training and testing set than didacross-family design. Collapsing rare variants via the k-means method and adding to the common SNPs did not improve prediction accuracies. The prediction model, including both pedigree and genomic information, achieved a slightly higher accuracy than using either source of information alone. Prediction of genetic contributions to complex traits is feasible using whole genome sequencing and statistical methods borrowed from animal breeding. The relatedness of individuals between the training and testing set strongly affected the performance of prediction models. Methods for inclusion of rare variants in these models need more development.

Identifiers

PMID25519339
PMCPMC4143683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.