Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25519304›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2015

Afferent nerve ending density in the human laryngeal mucosa: potential implications on endoscopic evaluation of laryngeal sensitivity.

Giovanni Ruoppolo, Ilenia Schettino, Antonella Biasiotta, Rocco Roma, Antonio Greco, Pietro Soldo, Dario Marcotullio, Alessandro Patella, Emanuela Onesti, Marco Ceccanti and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Validation of the DYALS (dysphagia in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) questionnaire for the evaluation of dysphagia in ALS patients.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  3. Sensory Innervation of the Larynx and the Search for Mucosal Mechanoreceptors.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cough hypersensitivity as a neuro-immune interaction.Clinical and translational allergy · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanni RuoppoloOtorhinolaryngology Section, Department of Sensorial Organs, Sapienza University, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy, giovanni.ruoppolo@uniroma1.it.
Ilenia Schettino
Antonella Biasiotta
Rocco Roma
Antonio Greco
Pietro Soldo
Dario Marcotullio
Alessandro Patella
Emanuela Onesti
Marco Ceccanti
Francesca Albino
Carla Giordano
Andrea Truini
Marco De Vincentiis
Maurizio Inghilleri
Sapienza University of Rome · ITBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laryngeal sensitivity is crucial for maintaining safe swallowing, thus avoiding silent aspiration. The sensitivity test, carried out by fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing, plays an important role in the assessment of dysphagic patients. The ventricular folds appear to be more sensitive than the epiglottis during the sensitivity test. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the mechanical sensitivity of the supraglottic larynx. In seven healthy adults undergoing microlaryngoscopy to remove vocal cord polyps, we excised mucosal samples from the epiglottis and ventricular folds. We measured afferent nerve fiber density by immunoelectron microscopy. All of the subjects underwent an endoscopic sensitivity test based on lightly touching the laryngeal surface of the epiglottis and ventricular folds. The discomfort level was self-rated by the subjects on the visual analog scale. Samples were fixed and stored in cryoprotectant solution at 4 °C. Sections were stained with the protein gene product 9.5, a pan-neuronal selective marker. Nerve fiber density was calculated as the number of fibers per millimeter length of section. The mean nerve fiber density was higher in ventricular samples than in epiglottis samples (2.96 ± 2.05 vs 0.83 ± 0.51; two-sided p = 0.018). The mean visual analog scale scores were significantly higher for touching the ventricular folds than for touching the epiglottis (8.28 ± 1.11 vs 4.14 ± 1.21; two-sided p = 0.017). The higher sensitivity of the ventricular region should be considered for further refining clinical endoscopic evaluation of laryngeal sensitivity.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDeglutitionEpiglottisHumansLaryngeal MucosaLaryngoscopyMicroscopy, ImmunoelectronMiddle AgedNerve EndingsNeurons, AfferentOptical FibersReflexSensory Thresholds

Identifiers

PMID25519304
OpenAlexW2010587010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.