Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25519302›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2015

LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery to the brain with concurrent vemurafenib for melanoma metastases.

Kamran A Ahmed, Jessica M Freilich, Sarah Sloot, Nicholas Figura, Geoffrey T Gibney, Jeffrey S Weber, Siriporn Sarangkasiri, Prakash Chinnaiyan, Peter A Forsyth, Arnold B Etame and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Systemic Therapy for Melanoma Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kamran A AhmedDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA, kamran.ahmed@moffitt.org.
Jessica M Freilich
Sarah Sloot
Nicholas Figura
Geoffrey T Gibney
Jeffrey S Weber
Siriporn Sarangkasiri
Prakash Chinnaiyan
Peter A Forsyth
Arnold B Etame
Nikhil G Rao
Moffitt Cancer Center · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While selective BRAF inhibitors have demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with metastatic BRAF V600E mutant melanoma, management of brain metastases prior to and during therapy presents challenges. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment for melanoma brain metastases, but there is limited safety and efficacy data on the use of SRS during BRAF therapy. An analysis was performed of patients with metastatic melanoma and brain metastases treated with SRS while on vemurafenib. MRI scans were reviewed post-SRS to evaluate local control (LC) as well as distant control. We identified 80 metastatic melanoma brain lesions treated in 24 patients. The median planning target volume was 0.28 cm(3) (range 0.05-4.19 cm(3)), and lesions were treated to a median dose of 24 Gy (range 15-24 Gy). The median follow up was 5.1 months (range 2-25.2 months). Eight (10 %) lesions showed progression at a median of 6.1 months (range 2-20.1 months) following SRS. Kaplan-Meier LC estimates at 6 and 12 months were 92 and 75 %, respectively. Fourteen (58 %) patients were noted to have distant brain failure at a median of 3.4 months (range 1.9-16.1 months) following treatment with SRS. Median overall (OS) from the date of SRS was 7.2 months (range 1.5-26.8 months) with a median of 11.9 months (range 1.5-28.5 months) since the date of brain metastases diagnosis. There was no evidence of increased toxicity with the combination of SRS and vemurafenib. SRS to brain metastases appears to be both safe and effective for patients treated concurrently with BRAF inhibitors.

Indexed as

Particle AcceleratorsRadiosurgeryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainBrain NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIndolesMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedIndolesSulfonamidesVemurafenib

Identifiers

PMID25519302
OpenAlexW2149507843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.