Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25519265›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2015

The epidemiology of reoperations for orthopaedic trauma.

R C Barksfield, R Coomber, K Woolf, A Prinja, D Wordsworth, D Lopez, S Burtt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Functional outcome in mini-fragment plating of the fibula in unstable ankle fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  2. Rate and factors associated with surgical site infection following aseptic revision fixation of orthopaedic trauma injuries.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Biofilm and its implications postfracture fixation: All I need to know.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R C BarksfieldLuton and Dunstable Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
R Coomber
K Woolf
A Prinja
D Wordsworth
D Lopez
S Burtt
Luton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBLuton and Dunstable Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) has issued guidance regarding the use of reoperation rates in the revalidation of UK-based orthopaedic surgeons. Currently, little has been published concerning acceptable rates of reoperation following primary surgical management of orthopaedic trauma, particularly with reference to revalidation.

methodsA retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing clearly defined reoperations following primary surgical management of trauma between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2011. A full case note review was undertaken to establish the demographics, clinical course and context of reoperation. A review of the imaging was performed to establish whether the procedure performed was in line with accepted trauma practice and whether the technical execution was acceptable.

resultsA total of 3,688 patients underwent primary procedures within the time period studied while 70 (1.90%, 99% CI: 1.39-2.55) required an unplanned reoperation. Thirty-nine (56%) of these patients were male. The mean age of patients was 56 years (range: 18-98 years) and there was a median time to reoperation of 50 days (IQR: 13-154 days). Potentially avoidable reoperations occurred in 41 patients (58.6%, 99% CI: 43.2-72.6). This was largely due to technical errors (40 patients, 57.1%, 99% CI: 41.8-71.3), representing 1.11% (99% CI: 0.73-1.64) of the total trauma workload. Within RCS guidelines, 28-day reoperation rates for hip, wrist and ankle fractures were 1.4% (99% CI: 0.5-3.3), 3.5% (99% CI: 0.8%-12.1) and 1.86% (99% CI: 0.4-6.6) respectively.

conclusionsWe present novel work that has established baseline reoperation rates for index procedures required for revalidation of orthopaedic surgeons.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrthopedic ProceduresReoperationRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25519265
PMCPMC4473898
OpenAlexW2098720649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.