Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25519224›Full record

Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2015

Trends in prevalent and incident opioid receipt: an observational study in Veterans Health Administration 2004-2012.

H J Mosher, E E Krebs, M Carrel, P J Kaboli, M W Vander Weg, B C Lund

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04170803 (Feasibility of Near-infrared Spectroscopy to Measure Cortical Pain Pathway), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04170803 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility of Near-infrared Spectroscopy to Measure Cortical Pain Pathway (Brain) Activation During Dry Needling

TypeinterventionalSponsorArmy-Baylor University Doctoral Program in Physical TherapyRan2019 to 2020Enrolled18ConditionsShoulder Pain, Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal InjuryArmsDry Needling, Sham Dry Needling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Patterns of pain medication use associated with reported pain interference in older adults with and without cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Nonopioid Alternatives to Addressing Pain Intensity: A Retrospective Look at 2 Noninvasive Pain Treatment Devices.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

H J MosherCenter for Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA, hilary.mosher@va.gov.
E E Krebs
M Carrel
P J Kaboli
M W Vander Weg
B C Lund

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproved understanding of temporal and regional trends may support safe and effective prescribing of opioids.

objectiveWe describe national, regional, and facility-level trends and variations in opioid receipt between fiscal years (FY) 2004 and 2012.

designObservational cohort study using Veterans Health Administration (VHA) administrative databases.

participantsAll patients receiving primary care within 137 VHA healthcare systems during a given study year and receiving medications from VHA one year before and during a given study year. MAIN MEASURES: Prevalent and incident opioid receipt during each year of the study period. KEY

resultsThe overall prevalence of opioid receipt increased from 18.9% of all veteran outpatients in FY2004 to 33.4% in FY2012, a 76.7% relative increase. In FY2012, women had higher rates of prevalent opioid receipt than men (42.4% vs. 32.9%), and the youngest veterans (18-34 years) had higher prevalent opioid receipt compared to the oldest veterans (≥ 80 years) (47.6% vs. 17.9%). All regions in the United States saw increased rates of prevalent opioid receipt during this time period. Prevalence rates varied widely by facility: in FY2012, the lowest-prescribing facility had a rate of 13.5%, and the highest of 50.8%. Annual incident opioid receipt increased from 8.8% in FY2004 to 10.2% in FY2011, with a decline to 9.8% in FY2012. Incident prescribing increased at some facilities and decreased at others. Facilities with high prevalent prescribing tended to have flat or decreasing incident prescribing rates during the study time frame.

conclusionsRates of opioid receipt increased throughout the study time frame, with wide variation in prevalent and incident rates across geographical region, sex, and age groups. Prevalence and incidence rates reflect distinct prescribing practices. Areas with the highest prevalence tended to have lower increases in incident opioid receipt over the study period. This likely reflects facility-level variations in prescribing practices as well as baseline rates of prevalent use. Future work assessing opioid prescribing should employ methodologies to account for and interpret both prevalent and incident opioid receipt.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsAmbulatory CareAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainCohort StudiesConfidence IntervalsDatabases, FactualDrug CostsDrug OverdoseDrug UtilizationFemaleHospitals, VeteransHumansLogistic ModelsAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID25519224
PMCPMC4395612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.