ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2015
Minimally invasive resection of choledochal cyst: a feasible and safe surgical option.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Navigating the Giant: A Case Series of Giant Choledochal Cysts in Infants Managed Laparoscopically.Cureus · 2026Article
- Comparison of long-term biliary complications between open and laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision in children.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2021Article
- A narrative review of the modern surgical management of pediatric choledochal cysts.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021Review
- Development of adenocarcinoma at the remnant intrapancreatic cyst 16 years after resection of the choledochal cyst.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2019Article
- A modified technique of single-incision laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy for children with choledochal cysts.BMC surgery · 2019Article
- Comparison of surgical outcomes of intracorporeal hepaticojejunostomy in the excision of choledochal cysts using laparoscopic versus robot techniques.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2018Article
- Pediatric choledochal cysts: diagnosis and current management.Pediatric surgery international · 2017Review
- Laparoscopic management of choledochal cysts: is a keyhole view missing the big picture?Pediatric surgery international · 2017Review
- [Minimally invasive surgery in childhood].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016Article
- Cosmetic selection of skin incision for resection of choledochal cyst in young female patients.Korean journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2016Article
- Choledochal Cyst Disease in a Western Center: A 30-Year Experience.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2016Article
- Choledochal Cyst in Adults: Etiopathogenesis, Presentation, Management, and Outcome-Case Series and Review.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for choledochal cyst (CC) has not been well documented. We sought to define the overall utilization and outcomes associated with the use of the open versus MIS approach for CC. We examined the factors associated with receipt of MIS for CC, as well as characterized perioperative and long-term outcomes following open versus MIS for CC.
methodsBetween 1972 and 2014, a total of 368 patients who underwent resection for CC were identified from an international, multicenter database. A 2:1 propensity score matching was used to create comparable cohorts of patients to assess the effect of MIS on short-term outcomes.
resultsThree hundred thirty-two patients had an open procedure, whereas 36 patients underwent an MIS approach. Children were more likely to be treated with a MIS approach (children, 24.0 % vs. adults, 2.1 %; P<0.001). Conversely, patients who had any medical comorbidity were less likely to undergo MIS surgery (open, 26.2 % vs. MIS, 2.8 %; P=0.002). In the propensity-matched cohort, MIS resection was associated with decreased length of stay (open, 7 days vs. MIS, 5 days), lower estimated blood loss (open, 50 mL vs. MIS, 17.5 mL), and longer operative time (open, 237 min vs. MIS, 301 min) compared with open surgery (all P<0.05). The overall and degree of complication did not differ between the open (grades I-II, n=13; grades III-IV, n=15) versus MIS (grades I-II, n=5; grades III-IV, n=5) cohorts (P=0.85). Five-year overall survival was 98.6 % (open, 98.0 % vs. MIS, 100.0 %; P=0.45); no patient who underwent MIS developed a subsequent cholangiocarcinoma.
conclusionsMIS resection of CC was demonstrated to be a feasible and safe approach with acceptable short-term outcomes in the pediatric population. MIS for benign CC disease was associated with similar perioperative morbidity but a shorter length of stay and a lower blood loss when compared with open resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.