Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25519004›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2015

Personalized Medicine Through SNP Testing for Breast Cancer Risk: Clinical Implementation.

Rebecca Howe, Talya Miron-Shatz, Yaniv Hanoch, Zehra B Omer, Cristina O'Donoghue, Elissa M Ozanne

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Clinical and Genetic Risk Prediction of Cognitive Impairment After Blood or Marrow Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancy.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Rebecca HoweFrank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, North Haven, CT, USA.
Talya Miron-ShatzCenter for Medical Decision Making, Ono Academic College, Kiryat Ono, Israel.
Yaniv HanochDepartment of Psychology, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK.
Zehra B OmerSchool of Medicine, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA.
Cristina O'DonoghueDepartment of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Elissa M OzanneDepartment of Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. elissa.m.ozanne@dartmouth.edu.
Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · USOno Academic College · ILQuinnipiac University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

Linking proteasome activity to DNA repair through hHR23R01CA097004 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI WALTERS, KYLIE J. · 2003 to 2012
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA-97-004NCI NIH HHS CA-97-019NCI NIH HHS N01-PC-55049-40
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have the potential to improve personalized medicine in breast cancer care. As new SNPs are discovered, further enhancing risk classification, SNP testing may serve to complement family history and phenotypic risk factors when assessed in a clinical setting. SNP analysis is particularly relevant to high-risk women who may seek out such information to guide their decision-making around risk-reduction. However, little is known about how high-risk women may respond to SNP testing with regard to clinical decision-making. We examined high-risk women's interest in SNP testing for breast cancer risk through an online survey of hypothetical testing scenarios. Women stated their preferences for sharing test results and selected the most likely follow-up action they would pursue in each of the test result scenarios (above average and below average risk for breast cancer). Four hundred seventy-eight women participated. Most women (89 %) did not know what a SNP was prior to the study. Once SNP testing was described, 75 % were interested in SNP testing. Participants stated an interest in lifestyle interventions for risk-reduction and wanted to discuss their testing results with their doctor or a genetic counselor. Women are interested in SNP testing and are prepared to make lifestyle changes based on testing results. Women's preference for discussing testing results with a healthcare provider aligns with the current trend towards SNP testing in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAdultBreast NeoplasmsDecision MakingFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansMiddle AgedPrecision MedicineBreast cancerDecision makingRisk assessmentSNP testing

Identifiers

PMID25519004
OpenAlexW2057029250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.