Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25518895›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2015

Attitudes and preferences for the clinical management of hypertension and hypertension-related cardiac disease in general practice: results of the Italian Hypertension and Heart Survey.

G Tocci, A F Cicero, M Salvetti, P Francia, A Ferrucci, C Borghi, M Volpe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Metabolic approaches to antihypertensive treatment in diabetic patients.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2015
    Article
  4. Cardiovascular prevention: the role of second generation of nutraceuticals.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

G Tocci1] Hypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Rome 'Sapienza', Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy [2] IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli Italy.
A F CiceroDivision of Internal Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
M SalvettiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
P FranciaHypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Rome 'Sapienza', Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
A FerrucciHypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Rome 'Sapienza', Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
C BorghiDivision of Internal Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
M Volpe1] Hypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Rome 'Sapienza', Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy [2] IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli Italy.
University of Bologna · ITIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate attitudes and preferences for the clinical management of hypertensive patients with cardiac organ disease, including left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and coronary artery disease (CAD), in Italy. A predefined 15-item questionnaire was anonymously administered to a large community sample of general practitioners (GPs) and specialised physicians between November 2012 and June 2013. Estimated prevalence of hypertension-related clinical conditions was stratified into four groups (10-20%, 20-40%, 40-50%, >50%); preferences were reported as percentage among valid answers to the survey questionnaire. A total of 1319 physicians (672 males, age 55.0 ± 7.1 years, age of medical activity 27.1 ± 7.6 years), among whom 1264 GPs and 55 specialised physicians, was included. LVH was reported to be the most frequent marker of organ damage by the majority of physicians (73.5%). LV diastolic dysfunction was reported to be relatively frequent (>40%) by more than half of the specialised physicians (58.2%) and less frequent (10-20%) by GPs (49.8%); LV systolic dysfunction, atrial fibrillation and CAD were considered to be less frequent (10-20%) by the majority of physicians (61.3, 71.6 and 53.3%, respectively). Echocardiography was the preferred diagnostic tool used to estimate LVH (76.6%). Tight blood pressure control (130/80 mm Hg) was considered to be the most appropriate by the majority of physicians, both in hypertensive patients with LVH and in those with CAD. With the well-known limitations of a cross-sectional survey, this study provides information on attitudes and preferences for the clinical management of outpatients with hypertension and high CV risk profile in general practice in Italy.

Indexed as

AttitudeCoronary Artery DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeneral PracticeHeart DiseasesHumansHypertensionHypertrophy, Left VentricularMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID25518895
OpenAlexW2027625779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.