Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25518036›Full record

SynthesisClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2014

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in HIV patients: risk factors associated with colonization and/or infection and methods for characterization of isolates - a systematic review.

Dennis de Carvalho Ferreira, Glaucilene Rodrigues da Silva, Fernanda Sampaio Cavalcante, Flavia Lima do Carmo, Leonardo Alexandre Fernandes, Suelen Moreira, Mauro Romero Leal Passos, Ana Paula Vieira Colombo, Katia Regina Netto dos Santos

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk factors for methicillin-resistantThe Journal of international medical research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. NasopharyngealAccess microbiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Germs · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dennis de Carvalho FerreiraBolsista da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), CAPES Foundation, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
Glaucilene Rodrigues da SilvaLaboratório de Infecção Hospitalar, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Fernanda Sampaio CavalcanteLaboratório de Infecção Hospitalar, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Flavia Lima do CarmoLaboratório de Ecologia Microbiana Molecular, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Leonardo Alexandre FernandesDepartment of Oral Medicine, Dental School, Veiga de Almeida University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Suelen MoreiraLaboratório de Infecção Hospitalar, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Mauro Romero Leal PassosDepartment of Microbiology, STD sector, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Ana Paula Vieira ColomboLaboratório de Microbiologia Oral, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Katia Regina Netto dos SantosLaboratório de Infecção Hospitalar, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Universidade Veiga de Almeida · BRCoordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is an important cause of infections and HIV-infected individuals are frequently susceptible to this pathogen. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review to identify both the risk factors associated with colonization/infection by methicillin-resistant S. aureus in HIV patients and the methods used for characterization of isolates. An electronic search of articles published between January 2001 and December 2013 was first conducted. Among 116 studies categorized as being at a quality level of A, B or C, only 9 studies were considered to have high methodological quality (level A). The majority of these studies were retrospective (4/9 studies). The risk factors associated with colonization/infection by S. aureus were use of antimicrobials (4/9 studies), previous hospitalization (4/9 studies) and low CD4+ T lymphocyte counts (<200 cells/μl) (3/9 studies). Culture in mannitol salt agar (3/9 studies) and the latex agglutination test (5/9 studies) were the main methods used for bacterial phenotypic identification. Genotypic profiles were accessed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (6/9 studies) and USA300 was the most prevalent lineage (5/9 studies). Most isolates were resistant to erythromycin (3/9 studies) and susceptible to vancomycin (4/9 studies). Ultimately, use of antimicrobials and previous hospitalization were the main risk factors for colonization/infection by methicillin-resistant S. aureus in HIV-infected individuals. However, the numbers of evaluated patients, the exclusion and inclusion criteria and the characterization of the S. aureus isolates were not uniform, which made it difficult to establish the characteristics associated with HIV patients who are colonized/infected by S. aureus.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHIV InfectionsHumansMethicillin ResistanceMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusRisk FactorsStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID25518036
PMCPMC4256048
OpenAlexW2163253019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.