Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25517992›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Replication attempt: "Effect of BMAP-28 antimicrobial peptides on Leishmania major promastigote and amastigote growth: role of leishmanolysin in parasite survival".

Elizabeth Iorns, William Gunn, Jessey Erath, Ana Rodriguez, Jian Zhou, Michael Benzinou, Reproducibility Initiative

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth IornsThe Reproducibility Initiative, c/o Science Exchange, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
William GunnThe Reproducibility Initiative, c/o Science Exchange, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Jessey ErathAnti-Infectives Screening Core Facility, Department of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Ana RodriguezAnti-Infectives Screening Core Facility, Department of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Jian ZhouLifeTein LLC, Hillsborough, New Jersey, United States of America.
Michael BenzinouThe Reproducibility Initiative, c/o Science Exchange, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Reproducibility Initiative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study describes an attempt to replicate experiments from the paper "Effect of BMAP-28 Antimicrobial Peptides on Leishmania major Promastigote and Amastigote Growth: Role of Leishmanolysin in Parasite Survival," which was submitted to the Reproducibility Initiative for independent validation. The cathelicidin bovine myeloid antimicrobial peptide 28 (BMAP-28) and its isomers were previously shown to have potent antiparasitic activity against Leishmania major. We tested the effectiveness of L-BMAP-28 and two of its isomers, the D-amino acid form (D-BMAP-28) and the retro-inverso form (RI-BMAP-28), in both unamidated and amidated forms, as anti-leishmanial agents against Leishmania major promastigotes in vitro. We observed that L-BMAP-28, as well as its D and RI isomers, demonstrate anti-leishmanial activity against L. major promastigotes in vitro. The inhibitory effect was lower than what was seen in the original study. At 2 µM of amidated peptides, the viability was 94%, 36%, and 66% with L-, D- and RI-peptides, versus 57%, 6%, and 18% in the original study.

Indexed as

Microbial ViabilityAnimalsAntiprotozoal AgentsHumansLeishmania majorMetalloendopeptidasesProteinsAntiprotozoal AgentsMetalloendopeptidasesProteins

Identifiers

PMID25517992
PMCPMC4269415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.