Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25517911›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2014

Characterizing heterogeneity in leukemic cells using single-cell gene expression analysis.

Assieh Saadatpour, Guoji Guo, Stuart H Orkin, Guo-Cheng Yuan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Stem cells in cancer initiation and progression.The Journal of cell biology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Human Cell Atlas: Technical approaches and challenges.Briefings in functional genomics · 2018
    Review
  14. Novel single-cell technologies in acute myeloid leukemia research.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Biologically Relevant Heterogeneity: Metrics and Practical Insights.SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Assieh Saadatpour
Guoji Guo
Stuart H Orkin
Guo-Cheng Yuan
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USBoston Children's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

CORE--ZEBRAFISHP30DK049216 · NIDDK · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI ORKIN, STUART H · 1999 to 2015
$14.3M
Toward a systematic understanding of targeting mechanisms for epigenetic factorsR01HG005085 · NHGRI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI YUAN, GUO-CHENG · 2011 to 2014
$1.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005085NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG005085NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK049216NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK049216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA fundamental challenge for cancer therapy is that each tumor contains a highly heterogeneous cell population whose structure and mechanistic underpinnings remain incompletely understood. Recent advances in single-cell gene expression profiling have created new possibilities to characterize this heterogeneity and to dissect the potential intra-cancer cellular hierarchy.

resultsHere, we apply single-cell analysis to systematically characterize the heterogeneity within leukemic cells using the MLL-AF9 driven mouse model of acute myeloid leukemia. We start with fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis with seven surface markers, and extend by using a multiplexing quantitative polymerase chain reaction approach to assay the transcriptional profile of a panel of 175 carefully selected genes in leukemic cells at the single-cell level. By employing a set of computational tools we find striking heterogeneity within leukemic cells. Mapping to the normal hematopoietic cellular hierarchy identifies two distinct subtypes of leukemic cells; one similar to granulocyte/monocyte progenitors and the other to macrophage and dendritic cells. Further functional experiments suggest that these subtypes differ in proliferation rates and clonal phenotypes. Finally, co-expression network analysis reveals similarities as well as organizational differences between leukemia and normal granulocyte/monocyte progenitor networks.

conclusionsOverall, our single-cell analysis pinpoints previously uncharacterized heterogeneity within leukemic cells and provides new insights into the molecular signatures of acute myeloid leukemia.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, LeukemicGenetic HeterogeneityGranulocyte Precursor CellsHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMiceMonocyte-Macrophage Precursor CellsNeoplasms, ExperimentalSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID25517911
PMCPMC4262970
OpenAlexW2100759421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.