ArticleCell stem cell2014
Efficient ablation of genes in human hematopoietic stem and effector cells using CRISPR/Cas9.
Article in Cell stem cell, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 271 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
271 citing papers in PubMed, 475 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Safety and feasibility of CRISPR-edited T cells in patients with refractory non-small-cell lung cancer.Nature medicine · 2020Trial
- CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing: technological advances, delivery strategies and precision engineering of primary cells for therapeutic application in genetic disorders and diabetes mellitus.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Engineering hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells to generate red blood cells as viral traps against HIV-1.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- CCR5 as a Therapeutic Target in HIV Disease: From CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing to Maraviroc-Mediated Inhibition.Viruses · 2026Review
- Nuclear RSK1 mediates interferon-γ-induced proinflammatory activation in human primary macrophages and humanized mice.Science advances · 2026Article
- Engineered lipid nanoparticles for in vivo and durable editing of haematopoietic stem cells within humanized mice.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- CRISPR-Cas9: Genome Engineering and Future Vaccine Applications.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Review
- Precise CRISPR-Mediated Editing of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A novel minimally humanized mouse model of aniridia for preclinical evaluation of CRISPR gene editing strategies.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Article
- A unified genetic perturbation language for human cellular programming.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Generation and functional analysis of melanoma antigen-specific CD8+ T cells derived from S/MAR vector-transfected human induced pluripotent stem cells.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Selective HLA knockdown and PD-L1 expression prevent allogeneic CAR-NK cell rejection and enhance safety and anti-tumor responses in xenograft mice.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Hypoimmune stem cells and islets: hype or a true breakthrough in diabetes treatment?Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2025Review
- Assessment the Efficacy of the CRISPR System for Inducing Mutations in the AIMP2 Gene to Create a Cell Line Model of HLD17 Disease.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Article
- Selective agonists of KIR and NKG2A to evade missing self response of natural killer cells.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Off-target interactions in the CRISPR-Cas9 Machinery: mechanisms and outcomes.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Review
- Ligand-modified rAAV6 vectors with nanoblades allow high-level gene knockin in HSPCs without compromising cell survival.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- New hope and promise with CRISPR-Cas9 technology for the treatment of HIV.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Scalable intracellular delivery via microfluidic vortex shedding enhances the function of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells.Scientific reports · 2025Article
211 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 has rapidly become the tool of choice by virtue of its efficacy and ease of use. However, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in clinically relevant human somatic cells remains untested. Here, we report CRISPR/Cas9 targeting of two clinically relevant genes, B2M and CCR5, in primary human CD4+ T cells and CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). Use of single RNA guides led to highly efficient mutagenesis in HSPCs but not in T cells. A dual guide approach improved gene deletion efficacy in both cell types. HSPCs that had undergone genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9 retained multilineage potential. We examined predicted on- and off-target mutations via target capture sequencing in HSPCs and observed low levels of off-target mutagenesis at only one site. These results demonstrate that CRISPR/Cas9 can efficiently ablate genes in HSPCs with minimal off-target mutagenesis, which could have broad applicability for hematopoietic cell-based therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.