Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25517303›Full record

ArticlemAbs2014

Bioanalytical strategy used in development of pharmacokinetic (PK) methods that support biosimilar programs.

Alex Colbert, Amber Umble-Romero, Samantha Prokop, Vincent Fung-Sing Chow, Teresa Wong, Danielle DeSimone, Lei Zhou, Susan Pederson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alex Colberta Department of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism ; Amgen Inc. ; USA.
Amber Umble-Romero
Samantha Prokop
Vincent Fung-Sing Chow
Teresa Wong
Danielle DeSimone
Lei Zhou
Susan Pederson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of biosimilar products is expected to grow rapidly over the next five years as a large number of approved biologics reach patent expiry. The pathway to regulatory approval requires that similarity of the biosimilar to the reference product be demonstrated through physiochemical and structural characterization, as well as within in vivo studies that compare the safety and efficacy profiles of the products. To support nonclinical and clinical studies pharmacokinetic (PK) assays are required to measure the biosimilar and reference products with comparable precision and accuracy. The most optimal approach is to develop a single PK assay, using a single analytical standard, for quantitative measurement of the biosimilar and reference products in serum matrix. Use of a single PK assay for quantification of multiple products requires a scientifically sound testing strategy to evaluate bioanalytical comparability of the test products within the method, and provide a solid data package to support the conclusions. To meet these objectives, a comprehensive approach with scientific rigor was applied to the development and characterization of PK assays that are used in support of biosimilar programs. Herein we describe the bioanalytical strategy and testing paradigm that has been used across several programs to determine bioanalytical comparability of the biosimilar and reference products. Data from one program is presented, with statistical results demonstrating the biosimilar and reference products were bioanalytically equivalent within the method. The cumulative work has established a framework for future biosimilar PK assay development.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological ProductsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsDrug DiscoveryDrug MonitoringHumansQuality ControlReference StandardsTechnology, PharmaceuticalTherapeutic EquivalencyBiological ProductsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsART, ambient room temperatureAvg, AverageBE, bioequivalencebioanalyticalbiosimilarbiotherapeuticsBQL, Below the Quantification LimitcomparabilityCV, Coefficient of VariationECL, ElectrochemiluminescentLLOQ, Lower Limit of QuantificationMRD, minimum required dilutionMSD, Meso Scale DiscoveryPD, pharmacodynamicspharmacodynamicspharmacokineticPK, pharmacokineticrecombinantTPA, TripropylamineULOQ, Upper Limit of Quantification

Identifiers

PMID25517303
PMCPMC4623269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.