ArticleNature2015
Enhancer-core-promoter specificity separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulation.
Article in Nature, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 297 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
297 citing papers in PubMed, 501 citations in OpenAlex.
- An atlas of transcription factor cooperation reveals how motif readers shape regulatory output.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Mechanisms and functional implications of long-range enhancer-dependent gene regulation.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- High-throughput functional characterization of enhancers in totipotent-like cells.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Synthetic Regulatory Genomics.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2026Review
- Using a modular massively parallel reporter assay to discover context-dependent regulatory activity in type 2 diabetes-linked noncoding regions.HGG advances · 2026Article
- Ligand-dependent enhancer activation indirectly modulates non-target promoters in a chromatin domain.eLife · 2026Article
- FOSL2 drives transcriptional activation of super‑enhancer-regulatedMolecular medicine reports · 2026Article
- Intrinsic promoter responsiveness dictates sensitivity to transcriptional activation by enhancers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Inter-individual gene expression variability implies stable regulation of brain-biased genes across organs in three ray-finned fishes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Loop extrusion by cohesin plays a role in enhancer-activated gene expression early in differentiation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Combinatorial histone modifications direct ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling by NURF to promoter-proximal nucleosomes.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- A genome-wide survey reveals that a diverse array of enhancers coordinates theGenome research · 2026Article
- STARR-CRAAVT: A platform to identify cell type-specific regulatory elements for next-generation gene therapy.iScience · 2026Article
- Enhancer hubs govern chromatin topology and Th17 cell identity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A functional overlap between actively transcribed genes and chromatin insulator elements.The EMBO journal · 2026Article
- Differential chromatin looping regulated by two GA-binding transcription factors creates an X-specific chromatin environment for dosage compensation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- From Natural Discovery to AI-Guided Design: A Curated Collection of Compact Enhancers for Crop Engineering.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- 3D-super-enhancers are condensate-associated cis-regulatory communities.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Epromoters bind key stress-related transcription factors to regulate clusters of stress response genes.The EMBO journal · 2026Article
- High-resolution binding data of TFIID and cofactors show promoter-specific differences in vivo.Research square · 2026Article
237 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Gene transcription in animals involves the assembly of RNA polymerase II at core promoters and its cell-type-specific activation by enhancers that can be located more distally. However, how ubiquitous expression of housekeeping genes is achieved has been less clear. In particular, it is unknown whether ubiquitously active enhancers exist and how developmental and housekeeping gene regulation is separated. An attractive hypothesis is that different core promoters might exhibit an intrinsic specificity to certain enhancers. This is conceivable, as various core promoter sequence elements are differentially distributed between genes of different functions, including elements that are predominantly found at either developmentally regulated or at housekeeping genes. Here we show that thousands of enhancers in Drosophila melanogaster S2 and ovarian somatic cells (OSCs) exhibit a marked specificity to one of two core promoters--one derived from a ubiquitously expressed ribosomal protein gene and another from a developmentally regulated transcription factor--and confirm the existence of these two classes for five additional core promoters from genes with diverse functions. Housekeeping enhancers are active across the two cell types, while developmental enhancers exhibit strong cell-type specificity. Both enhancer classes differ in their genomic distribution, the functions of neighbouring genes, and the core promoter elements of these neighbouring genes. In addition, we identify two transcription factors--Dref and Trl--that bind and activate housekeeping versus developmental enhancers, respectively. Our results provide evidence for a sequence-encoded enhancer-core-promoter specificity that separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulatory programs for thousands of enhancers and their target genes across the entire genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.