Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25517091›Full record

ArticleNature2015

Enhancer-core-promoter specificity separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulation.

Muhammad A Zabidi, Cosmas D Arnold, Katharina Schernhuber, Michaela Pagani, Martina Rath, Olga Frank, Alexander Stark

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 297 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
297citing papers in PubMed
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

297 citing papers in PubMed, 501 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Synthetic Regulatory Genomics.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Enhancer hubs govern chromatin topology and Th17 cell identity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

237 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad A ZabidiResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology IMP, Vienna Biocenter VBC, Dr Bohr-Gasse 7, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Cosmas D ArnoldResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology IMP, Vienna Biocenter VBC, Dr Bohr-Gasse 7, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Katharina SchernhuberResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology IMP, Vienna Biocenter VBC, Dr Bohr-Gasse 7, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Michaela PaganiResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology IMP, Vienna Biocenter VBC, Dr Bohr-Gasse 7, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Martina RathResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology IMP, Vienna Biocenter VBC, Dr Bohr-Gasse 7, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Olga FrankResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology IMP, Vienna Biocenter VBC, Dr Bohr-Gasse 7, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Alexander StarkResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology IMP, Vienna Biocenter VBC, Dr Bohr-Gasse 7, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Vienna Biocenter · ATResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF F 4303Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1207European Research Council 242922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene transcription in animals involves the assembly of RNA polymerase II at core promoters and its cell-type-specific activation by enhancers that can be located more distally. However, how ubiquitous expression of housekeeping genes is achieved has been less clear. In particular, it is unknown whether ubiquitously active enhancers exist and how developmental and housekeeping gene regulation is separated. An attractive hypothesis is that different core promoters might exhibit an intrinsic specificity to certain enhancers. This is conceivable, as various core promoter sequence elements are differentially distributed between genes of different functions, including elements that are predominantly found at either developmentally regulated or at housekeeping genes. Here we show that thousands of enhancers in Drosophila melanogaster S2 and ovarian somatic cells (OSCs) exhibit a marked specificity to one of two core promoters--one derived from a ubiquitously expressed ribosomal protein gene and another from a developmentally regulated transcription factor--and confirm the existence of these two classes for five additional core promoters from genes with diverse functions. Housekeeping enhancers are active across the two cell types, while developmental enhancers exhibit strong cell-type specificity. Both enhancer classes differ in their genomic distribution, the functions of neighbouring genes, and the core promoter elements of these neighbouring genes. In addition, we identify two transcription factors--Dref and Trl--that bind and activate housekeeping versus developmental enhancers, respectively. Our results provide evidence for a sequence-encoded enhancer-core-promoter specificity that separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulatory programs for thousands of enhancers and their target genes across the entire genome.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCell LineDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenes, EssentialGenome, InsectModels, GeneticOrgan SpecificityPromoter Regions, GeneticSubstrate SpecificityTranscriptional ActivationTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsDref protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsTranscription FactorsTrl protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID25517091
PMCPMC6795551
OpenAlexW2029492292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.