ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2014
Large bowel injuries during gynecological laparoscopy.
Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Forensic evaluation of the gastrointestinal injuries during gynecologic - obstetrics operative procedures.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- [Complicated course after cecal injury during laparoscopic salpingectomy].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2019Article
- Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2018Article
- Portomesenteric vein thrombosis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity.BMJ case reports · 2017Article
- Open Versus Closed Laparoscopy: Yet an Unresolved Controversy.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016Article
- [Management of more frequent complications of laparoscopic surgery. Minimally invasive or always open surgery?].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2015Article
- [Complicated course of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2015Article
- Extraperitoneal Laparoscopy in Severe Intra-abdominal Adhesions: A Safe Alternative to Laparotomy.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopy is one of the most frequently preferred surgical options in gynecological surgery and has advantages over laparotomy, including smaller surgical scars, faster recovery, less pain and earlier return of bowel functions. Generally, it is also accepted as safe and effective and patients tolerate it well. However, it is still an intra-abdominal procedure and has the similar potential risks of laparotomy, including injury of a vital structure, bleeding and infection. Besides the well-known risks of open surgery, laparoscopy also has its own unique risks related to abdominal access methods, pneumoperitoneum created to provide adequate operative space and the energy modalities used during the procedures. Bowel, bladder or major blood vessel injuries and passage of gas into the intravascular space may result from laparoscopic surgical technique. In addition, the risks of aspiration, respiratory dysfunction and cardiovascular dysfunction increase during laparoscopy. Large bowel injuries during laparoscopy are serious complications because 50% of bowel injuries and 60% of visceral injuries are undiagnosed at the time of primary surgery. A missed or delayed diagnosis increases the risk of bowel perforation and consequently sepsis and even death. In this paper, we aim to focus on large bowel injuries that happen during gynecological laparoscopy and review their diagnostic and management options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.