Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25516838›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance2014

Repurposing of approved drugs from the human pharmacopoeia to target Wolbachia endosymbionts of onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis.

Kelly L Johnston, Louise Ford, Indira Umareddy, Simon Townson, Sabine Specht, Kenneth Pfarr, Achim Hoerauf, Ralf Altmeyer, Mark J Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Autophagy is essential for anti-Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dual RNA-seq in filarial nematodes andFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kelly L JohnstonFilariasis Research Group, Department of Parasitology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK.
Louise FordFilariasis Research Group, Department of Parasitology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK.
Indira UmareddyCombinatoRx-Singapore Ptd Ltd, 11 Biopolis Way, 138667 Singapore, Singapore.
Simon TownsonTropical Parasitic Diseases Unit, Northwick Park Institute for Medical Research, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ, UK.
Sabine SpechtInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology & Parasitology, University Hospital of Bonn, Sigmund Freud Strasse 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
Kenneth PfarrInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology & Parasitology, University Hospital of Bonn, Sigmund Freud Strasse 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
Achim HoeraufInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology & Parasitology, University Hospital of Bonn, Sigmund Freud Strasse 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
Ralf AltmeyerCombinatoRx-Singapore Ptd Ltd, 11 Biopolis Way, 138667 Singapore, Singapore ; Institut Pasteur Shanghai, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 320 Yueyang Road, 200031 Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Mark J TaylorFilariasis Research Group, Department of Parasitology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEChinese Academy of Sciences · CNNorthwick Park Institute for Medical Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis are debilitating diseases caused by parasitic filarial nematodes infecting around 150 million people throughout the tropics with more than 1.5 billion at risk. As with other neglected tropical diseases, classical drug-discovery and development is lacking and a 50 year programme of macrofilaricidal discovery failed to deliver a drug which can be used as a public health tool. Recently, antibiotic targeting of filarial Wolbachia, an essential bacterial symbiont, has provided a novel drug treatment for filariasis with macrofilaricidal activity, although the current gold-standard, doxycycline, is unsuitable for use in mass drug administration (MDA). The anti-Wolbachia (A·WOL) Consortium aims to identify novel anti-Wolbachia drugs, compounds or combinations that are suitable for use in MDA. Development of a Wolbachia cell-based assay has enabled the screening of the approved human drug-pharmacopoeia (∼2600 drugs) for a potential repurposing. This screening strategy has revealed that approved drugs from various classes show significant bacterial load reduction equal to or superior to the gold-standard doxycycline, with 69 orally available hits from different drug categories being identified. Based on our defined hit criteria, 15 compounds were then selectively screened in a Litomosoides sigmodontis mouse model, 4 of which were active. These came from the tetracycline, fluoroquinolone and rifamycin classes. This strategy of repurposing approved drugs is a promising development in the goal of finding a novel treatment against filariasis and could also be a strategy applicable for other neglected tropical diseases.

Indexed as

Anti-Wolbachia Consortium (A·WOL)Drug discoveryFilariasisLibrary screeningPharmacopoeiaWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID25516838
PMCPMC4266796
OpenAlexW2093203016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.