Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25516800›Full record

ArticleJournal of therapeutic ultrasound2013

Focused ultrasound-mediated drug delivery to pancreatic cancer in a mouse model.

Natalya Rapoport, Allison Payne, Christopher Dillon, Jill Shea, Courtney Scaife, Roohi Gupta

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of therapeutic ultrasound, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05262452 (Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Concurrent FOLFIRINOX Plus HIFU for Locally Advanced/Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05262452 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Concurrent FOLFIRINOX Plus HIFU for Locally Advanced/Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Single-center, Single-arm, Investigator-initiated, Open-labeled, Exploratory Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsPancreatic Cancer Non-resectable, Chemotherapy Effect, Ultrasound TherapyArmsALPIUS 900, an ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound system, FOLFIRINOX regimen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Ultrasound-sensitive nanodroplets achieve targeted neuromodulation.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Article
  13. Focused ultrasound robotic system for very small bore magnetic resonance imaging.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2020
    Article
  14. Ultrasound-responsive droplets for therapy: A review.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2019
    Review
  15. Neutron-activatable needles for radionuclide therapy of solid tumors.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Molecular Imaging in Nanotechnology and Theranostics.Molecular imaging and biology · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalya RapoportDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, 36 S. Wasatch Dr., Room 3100, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Allison PayneDepartment of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Christopher DillonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, 36 S. Wasatch Dr., Room 3100, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Jill SheaDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Courtney ScaifeDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Roohi GuptaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, 36 S. Wasatch Dr., Room 3100, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA ; Current address: Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, P0103, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
University of Utah · USWasatch Molecular (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany aspects of the mechanisms involved in ultrasound-mediated therapy remain obscure. In particular, the relative roles of drug and ultrasound, the effect of the time of ultrasound application, and the effect of tissue heating are not yet clear. The current study was undertaken with the goal to clarify these aspects of the ultrasound-mediated drug delivery mechanism.

methodsFocused ultrasound-mediated drug delivery was performed under magnetic resonance imaging guidance (MRgFUS) in a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) model grown subcutaneously in nu/nu mice. Paclitaxel (PTX) was used as a chemotherapeutic agent because it manifests high potency in the treatment of gemcitabine-resistant PDA. Poly(ethylene oxide)-co-poly(d,l-lactide) block copolymer stabilized perfluoro-15-crown-5-ether nanoemulsions were used as drug carriers. MRgFUS was applied at sub-ablative pressure levels in both continuous wave and pulsed modes, and only a fraction of the tumor was treated.

resultsPositive treatment effects and even complete tumor resolution were achieved by treating the tumor with MRgFUS after injection of nanodroplet encapsulated drug. The MRgFUS treatment enhanced the action of the drug presumably through enhanced tumor perfusion and blood vessel and cell membrane permeability that increased the drug supply to tumor cells. The effect of the pulsed MRgFUS treatment with PTX-loaded nanodroplets was clearly smaller than that of continuous wave MRgFUS treatment, supposedly due to significantly lower temperature increase as measured with MR thermometry and decreased extravasation. The time of the MRgFUS application after drug injection also proved to be an important factor with the best results observed when ultrasound was applied at least 6 h after the injection of drug-loaded nanodroplets. Some collateral damage was observed with particular ultrasound protocols supposedly associated with enhanced inflammation.

conclusionThis presented data suggest that there exists an optimal range of ultrasound application parameters and drug injection time. Decreased tumor growth, or complete resolution, was achieved with continuous wave ultrasound pressures below or equal to 3.1 MPa and drug injection times of at least 6 h prior to treatment. Increased acoustic pressure or ultrasound application before or shortly after drug injection gave increased tumor growth when compared to other protocols.

Indexed as

MRgFUSPancreatic cancerPerfluorocarbon nanoemulsionsUltrasound-mediated drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID25516800
PMCPMC4265944
OpenAlexW2150006295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.