Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25516765›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2014

Predictive values and other quality criteria of the German version of the Nurse-Work Instability Scale (Nurse-WIS) - follow-up survey findings of a prospective study of a cohort of geriatric care workers.

Melanie Harling, Anja Schablon, Claudia Peters, Albert Nienhaus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nurse-work instability and incidence of sick leave - results of a prospective study of nurses aged over 40.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2018
    Article
  4. What do healthcare workers in elderly care know about occupational health and safety? An explorative survey.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melanie HarlingCompetence Centre for Epidemiology and Health Services Research in Nursing (CVcare), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Building O17, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.
Anja SchablonCompetence Centre for Epidemiology and Health Services Research in Nursing (CVcare), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Building O17, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.
Claudia PetersCompetence Centre for Epidemiology and Health Services Research in Nursing (CVcare), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Building O17, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.
Albert NienhausCompetence Centre for Epidemiology and Health Services Research in Nursing (CVcare), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Building O17, Hamburg, 20246, Germany ; Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services, Department of Occupational Health Research, Pappelallee 35/37, Hamburg, 22089, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUntil now there has been a lack of effective screening instruments for health care workers at risk. To counteract the forecast shortage for health care workers, the offer of early interventions to maintain their work ability will become a central concern. The Nurse-Work Instability Scale (Nurse-WIS) seems to be suitable as a screening instrument and therefore a prospective study of a cohort of nursing staff from nursing homes was undertaken to validate the Nurse-Work Instability Scale (Nurse-WIS).

methodsThe follow-up data was used to test the sensitivity, specificity and the predictive values of the Nurse-WIS. The participants answered a questionnaire in the baseline investigation (T1) and in a follow-up 12 month after baseline. The hypothesis was that geriatric care workers with an increased risk according to the Nurse-WIS in T1 would be more likely to have taken long-term sick leave or drawn a pension for reduced work capacity in T2.

results396 persons took part in T1 (21.3% response), 225 in T2 (42.3% loss-to-follow-up). In T1, 28.4% indicated an increased risk according to the Nurse-WIS. In T2, 10.2% had taken long-term sick leave or had drawn a pension for reduced work capacity. The sensitivity is 73.9% (95%-CI 55.7%-92.3%), the specificity is 76.7% (95%-CI 71.2%-82.8%). The ROC AUC indicated a moderate precision for the scale, at 0.74 (95%-CI 0.64-0.84). The PPV of the Nurse-WIS is 26.6%, and the NPV is 96.3%. For those with an increased risk according to the Nurse-WIS, the probability in T2 of long-term sick leave or a pension for reduced work capacity is around eight times higher (OR 8.3, 95%-CI 2.90-23.07). Persons who had indicated a long-term sick leave or made an application for a pension for reduced work capacity in T1 had a 17 times higher risk (OR 17.4, 95%-CI 3.34-90.55).

conclusionThe German version of the Nurse-WIS appears to be a valid instrument with satisfactory predictive capabilities for recording an impending long-term sick leave. Whether the Nurse-WIS can be used as a screening tool which helps to design risk adjusted prevention programs for the afflicted nurse should be studied.

Indexed as

Long-term sick leaveMusculoskeletal disordersNursesNurse-work instability scale

Identifiers

PMID25516765
PMCPMC4265889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.