Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25516664›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Genomic landscape of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Niklas Gebauer, Christian Schmidt-Werthern, Veronica Bernard, Alfred C Feller, Tobias Keck, Nehara Begum, Dirk Rades, Hendrik Lehnert, Georg Brabant, Christoph Thorns

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (GEP-NENs).Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Niklas GebauerNiklas Gebauer, Christian Schmidt-Werthern, Veronica Bernard, Alfred C Feller, Christoph Thorns, Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Luebeck, Germany.
Christian Schmidt-WerthernNiklas Gebauer, Christian Schmidt-Werthern, Veronica Bernard, Alfred C Feller, Christoph Thorns, Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Luebeck, Germany.
Veronica BernardNiklas Gebauer, Christian Schmidt-Werthern, Veronica Bernard, Alfred C Feller, Christoph Thorns, Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Luebeck, Germany.
Alfred C FellerNiklas Gebauer, Christian Schmidt-Werthern, Veronica Bernard, Alfred C Feller, Christoph Thorns, Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Luebeck, Germany.
Tobias KeckNiklas Gebauer, Christian Schmidt-Werthern, Veronica Bernard, Alfred C Feller, Christoph Thorns, Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Luebeck, Germany.
Nehara BegumNiklas Gebauer, Christian Schmidt-Werthern, Veronica Bernard, Alfred C Feller, Christoph Thorns, Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Luebeck, Germany.
Dirk RadesNiklas Gebauer, Christian Schmidt-Werthern, Veronica Bernard, Alfred C Feller, Christoph Thorns, Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Luebeck, Germany.
Hendrik LehnertNiklas Gebauer, Christian Schmidt-Werthern, Veronica Bernard, Alfred C Feller, Christoph Thorns, Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Luebeck, Germany.
Georg BrabantNiklas Gebauer, Christian Schmidt-Werthern, Veronica Bernard, Alfred C Feller, Christoph Thorns, Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Luebeck, Germany.
Christoph ThornsNiklas Gebauer, Christian Schmidt-Werthern, Veronica Bernard, Alfred C Feller, Christoph Thorns, Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Luebeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the prognostic role of genomic stability and copy number alterations (CNAs) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs).

methodsA high-resolution array-based comparative genomic hybridization approach was utilized in order to investigate and quantify chromosomal aberrations in a panel of 37 primary PanNET and 11 metastatic samples. DNA samples were extracted from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor specimen. Genomic findings were correlated with histopathological and immunohistochemical data. Moreover, the dataset was subjected to employing an unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis approach utilizing Euclidean distance and average linkage and associations between genomically defined tumor groups and recurrent CNAs or clinicopathological features of the study group were assessed.

resultsNumerous chromosomal aberrations were recurrently detected in both, primary tumor samples and metastases. Copy number gains were most frequently observed at 06p22.2-p22.1 (27.1%), 17p13.1 (20.8%), 07p21.3-p21.2 (18.8%), 09q34.11 (18.8%). Genomic losses were significantly less frequent and the only recurrent aberration affected 08q24.3 (6.3%). Moreover, we detected a high degree of genomic heterogeneity between primary tumors and metastatic lesions. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of loci affected by CNAs in more than 3 primary tumor samples revealed two genetically distinct tumor groups as well as two chromosomal clusters of genomic imbalances indicating a small subset of tumors with common molecular features (13.5%). Aberrations affecting 6p22.2-22.1, 8q24.3, 9q34.11 and 17p13.1 (P = 0.011; 0.003; 0.003; 0.001), were significantly associated with a poorer survival prognosis.

conclusionThis study suggests that several frequent CNAs in numerous candidate regions are involved in the pathogenesis and metastatic progression of PanNET.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGene DosageGenomic InstabilityAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorChromosome AberrationsCluster AnalysisComparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenomicsHumansImmunohistochemistryBiomarkers, TumorArray comparative genomic hybridizationChromosomal aberrationsCopy number alterationsPancreatic neuroendocrine tumorsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID25516664
PMCPMC4265611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.