Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25516661›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Verification of gene expression profiles for colorectal cancer using 12 internet public microarray datasets.

Yu-Tien Chang, Chung-Tay Yao, Sui-Lung Su, Yu-Ching Chou, Chi-Ming Chu, Chi-Shuan Huang, Harn-Jing Terng, Hsiu-Ling Chou, Thomas Wetter, Kang-Hua Chen and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Trans-acting translational regulatory RNA binding proteins.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu-Tien ChangYu-Tien Chang, Chi-Ming Chu, Yun-Wen Shih, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Chung-Tay YaoYu-Tien Chang, Chi-Ming Chu, Yun-Wen Shih, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Sui-Lung SuYu-Tien Chang, Chi-Ming Chu, Yun-Wen Shih, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Yu-Ching ChouYu-Tien Chang, Chi-Ming Chu, Yun-Wen Shih, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Chi-Ming ChuYu-Tien Chang, Chi-Ming Chu, Yun-Wen Shih, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Chi-Shuan HuangYu-Tien Chang, Chi-Ming Chu, Yun-Wen Shih, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Harn-Jing TerngYu-Tien Chang, Chi-Ming Chu, Yun-Wen Shih, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Hsiu-Ling ChouYu-Tien Chang, Chi-Ming Chu, Yun-Wen Shih, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Thomas WetterYu-Tien Chang, Chi-Ming Chu, Yun-Wen Shih, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Kang-Hua ChenYu-Tien Chang, Chi-Ming Chu, Yun-Wen Shih, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Chi-Wen ChangYu-Tien Chang, Chi-Ming Chu, Yun-Wen Shih, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Yun-Wen ShihYu-Tien Chang, Chi-Ming Chu, Yun-Wen Shih, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Ching-Huang LaiYu-Tien Chang, Chi-Ming Chu, Yun-Wen Shih, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
National Defense Medical Center · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo verify gene expression profiles for colorectal cancer using 12 internet public microarray datasets.

methodsLogistic regression analysis was performed, and odds ratios for each gene were determined between colorectal cancer (CRC) and controls. Twelve public microarray datasets of GSE 4107, 4183, 8671, 9348, 10961, 13067, 13294, 13471, 14333, 15960, 17538, and 18105, which included 519 cases of adenocarcinoma and 88 normal mucosa controls, were pooled and used to verify 17 selective genes from 3 published studies and estimate the external generality.

resultsWe validated the 17 CRC-associated genes from studies by Chang et al (Model 1: 5 genes), Marshall et al (Model 2: 7 genes) and Han et al (Model 3: 5 genes) and performed the multivariate logistic regression analysis using the pooled 12 public microarray datasets as well as the external validation. The goodness-of-fit test of Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) showed statistical significance (P = 0.044) for Model 2 of Marshall et al in which observed event rates did not match expected event rates in subgroups of the model population. Expected and observed event rates in subgroups were similar, which are called well calibrated, in Models 1, 3 and 4 with non-significant P values of 0.460, 0.194 and 1.000 for H-L tests, respectively. A 7-gene model of CPEB4, EIF2S3, MGC20553, MS4A1, ANXA3, TNFAIP6 and IL2RB was pairwise selected, which showed the best results in logistic regression analysis (H-L P = 1.000, R (2) = 0.951, areas under the curve = 0.999, accuracy = 0.968, specificity = 0.966 and sensitivity = 0.994).

conclusionA novel gene expression profile was associated with CRC and can potentially be applied to blood-based detection assays.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticInternetOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsGene Expression ProfilingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLogistic ModelsMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsBiomarkers, TumorColorectal cancerGene Expression OmnibusGene Expression Omnibus seriesGene expression profilesMicroarray

Identifiers

PMID25516661
PMCPMC4265608
OpenAlexW2019871851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.