Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25516428›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2015

Color vision and neuroretinal function in diabetes.

B E Wolff, M A Bearse, M E Schneck, K Dhamdhere, W W Harrison, S Barez, A J Adams

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Immune Fingerprint in Diabetes: Ocular Surface and Retinal Inflammation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The innate immune system in diabetic retinopathy.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. An Update on Connexin Gap Junction and Hemichannels in Diabetic Retinopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B E WolffSchool of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720-2020, USA, bewolff1@berkeley.edu.
M A Bearse
M E Schneck
K Dhamdhere
W W Harrison
S Barez
A J Adams
University of California, Berkeley · USMidwestern University · US

Funding

VISION CHANGES IN DIABETICSR01EY002271 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ADAMS, ANTHONY J · 1985 to 2010
$3.6M
Predicting diabetic macular edema using functional measuresR01EY021811 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SCHNECK, MARILYN EVE · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS EY021811NEI NIH HHS EY02271NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002271NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe investigate how type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) affect color vision (CV) and mfERG implicit time (IT), whether CV and IT are correlated, and whether CV and IT abnormality classifications agree.

methodsAdams desaturated D-15 color test, mfERG, and fundus photographs were examined in 37 controls, 22 T2DM patients without DR (NoRet group), and 25 T2DM patients with DR (Ret group). Color confusion score (CCS) was calculated. ITs were averaged within the central 7 hexagons (central IT; ≤4.5°) and outside this area (peripheral IT; ≥4.5°). DR was within (DRIN) or outside (DROUT) of the central 7 hexagons. Group differences, percentages of abnormalities, correlations, and agreement were determined.

resultsCCS was greater in the NoRet (P = 0.002) and Ret (P < 0.0001) groups than in control group. CCS was abnormal in 3, 41, and 48 % of eyes in the control, NoRet, and Ret groups, respectively. Ret group CV abnormalities were more frequent in DRIN than in DROUT subgroups (71 vs. 18 %, respectively; P < 0.0001). CCS and IT were correlated only in the Ret group, in both retinal zones (P ≤ 0.028). Only in the Ret group did CCS and peripheral IT abnormality classifications agree (72 %; P < 0.05).

conclusionCV is affected in patients with T2DM, even without DR. Central DR increases the likelihood of a CV deficit compared with non-central DR. mfERG IT averaged across central or peripheral retinal locations is less frequently abnormal than CV in the absence of DR, and these two measures are correlated only when DR is present.

Indexed as

AdultAgedColor Perception TestsColor Vision DefectsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalElectroretinographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetina

Identifiers

PMID25516428
PMCPMC4459591
OpenAlexW1992408013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.