Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25516294›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2015

[Mass poisoning events].

H Desel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 78% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

H DeselGiftinformationszentrum-Nord der Länder Bremen, Hamburg, Niedersachsen und Schleswig-Holstein (GIZ-Nord) und Rechtsmedizinisches Labor für forensisch-toxikologische Analytik und klinisch-toxikologisches Labor, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen - Georg-August-Universität, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland, hdesel@giz-nord.de.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMass poisoning events are rare and different in some respects from other mass casualties, especially with regard to diagnosis and triage.

objectivesBased on the description of important historical events and experiences of poison control centers, an overview is provided for different types of mass poisoning events as well as guidelines for specific medical management. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe review is based on a literature search and case reports notified to the Giftinformationszentrum-Nord Poisons Center.

resultsToxicological risk assessment is based on identification of all relevant agents, evaluation of their toxic hazards (toxicity), and evaluation of the exposure (dose and pathway) for all persons exposed. This risk assessment constitutes the basis of medical diagnosis and management. In cases of suspicion of poisoning or poisonings caused by illegal drugs, risk assessment may be difficult due to the lack of important data needed for risk assessment. Mass poisonings caused by ethanol or contaminated food are well understood, with therapy being mainly symptomatic. However, in rare poisonings by other agents, a specific antidote treatment may be important. Thus, adequate antidote supplies must be available for these events.

conclusionAs hardly any medical professional has personal practical knowledge of mass poisoning casualties, such events are unique experiences. Thorough preparation and intensive cooperation with poison control centers and-if applicable-public health authorities may be important for best practice event management.

Indexed as

Mass Casualty IncidentsFoodborne DiseasesGermanyGuideline AdherenceHumansPoison Control CentersPoisoning

Identifiers

PMID25516294
OpenAlexW2259261385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.