Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25515985›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2015

Face, content, and construct validity of the EndoViS training system for objective assessment of psychomotor skills of laparoscopic surgeons.

Fernando Pérez Escamirosa, Ricardo Manuel Ordorica Flores, Ignacio Oropesa García, Cristian Rubén Zalles Vidal, Arturo Minor Martínez

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Needle path planning in semiautonomous and teleoperated robot-assisted epidural anaesthesia procedure: A proof of concept.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Objective classification of psychomotor laparoscopic skills of surgeons based on three different approaches.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Simulation and Training of Gynaecological Skills.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Objective assessment based on motion-related metrics and technical performance in laparoscopic suturing.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando Pérez EscamirosaBioelectronics Section, Department of Electrical Engineering, Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute of Mexico (CINVESTAV - IPN), Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional No. 2508, Col. San Pedro Zacatenco, 07360, Mexico City, Mexico. fperez@cinvestav.mx.
Ricardo Manuel Ordorica FloresDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ignacio Oropesa GarcíaBioengineering and Telemedicine Centre (GBT), ETSI Telecommunication, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.
Cristian Rubén Zalles VidalDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Arturo Minor MartínezBioelectronics Section, Department of Electrical Engineering, Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute of Mexico (CINVESTAV - IPN), Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional No. 2508, Col. San Pedro Zacatenco, 07360, Mexico City, Mexico.
Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez · MXCenter for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute · MXUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to present face, content, and constructs validity of the endoscopic orthogonal video system (EndoViS) training system and determines its efficiency as a training and objective assessment tool of the surgeons' psychomotor skills.

methodsThirty-five surgeons and medical students participated in this study: 11 medical students, 19 residents, and 5 experts. All participants performed four basic skill tasks using conventional laparoscopic instruments and EndoViS training system. Subsequently, participants filled out a questionnaire regarding the design, realism, overall functionality, and its capabilities to train hand-eye coordination and depth perception, rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Motion data of the instruments were obtained by means of two webcams built into a laparoscopic physical trainer. To identify the surgical instruments in the images, colored markers were placed in each instrument. Thirteen motion-related metrics were used to assess laparoscopic performance of the participants. Statistical analysis of performance was made between novice, intermediate, and expert groups. Internal consistency of all metrics was analyzed with Cronbach's α test.

resultsOverall scores about features of the EndoViS system were positives. Participants agreed with the usefulness of tasks and the training capacities of EndoViS system (score >4). Results presented significant differences in the execution of three skill tasks performed by participants. Seven metrics showed construct validity for assessment of performance with high consistency levels.

conclusionsEndoViS training system has been successfully validated. Results showed that EndoViS was able to differentiate between participants of varying laparoscopic experience. This simulator is a useful and effective tool to objectively assess laparoscopic psychomotor skills of the surgeons.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetencePsychomotor PerformanceAdultFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMexicoMiddle AgedSimulation TrainingVideo RecordingEndoscopic orthogonal video system (EndoViS)Laparoscopic surgeryMotion metricsObjective assessmentSurgical trainingValidation

Identifiers

PMID25515985
OpenAlexW1998152980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.