Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25515769›Full record

ReviewPhotosynthesis research2015

Challenges of metagenomics and single-cell genomics approaches for exploring cyanobacterial diversity.

Michelle Davison, Eric Hall, Richard Zare, Devaki Bhaya

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Photosynthesis research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michelle DavisonDepartment of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution of Science, 260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. shellblu@stanford.edu.
Eric HallSRI International, 333 Ravenswood Ave, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Richard ZareDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, 333 Campus Drive Mudd Building, Room 121, Stanford, CA, 94305-4401, USA.
Devaki BhayaDepartment of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution of Science, 260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyanobacteria have played a crucial role in the history of early earth and continue to be instrumental in shaping our planet, yet applications of cutting edge technology have not yet been widely used to explore cyanobacterial diversity. To provide adequate background, we briefly review current sequencing technologies and their innovative uses in genomics and metagenomics. Next, we focus on current cell capture technologies and the challenges of using them with cyanobacteria. We illustrate the utility in coupling breakthroughs in DNA amplification with cell capture platforms, with an example of microfluidic isolation and subsequent targeted amplicon sequencing from individual terrestrial thermophilic cyanobacteria. Single cells of thermophilic, unicellular Synechococcus sp. JA-2-3-B'a(2-13) (Syn OS-B') were sorted in a microfluidic device, lysed, and subjected to whole genome amplification by multiple displacement amplification. We amplified regions from specific CRISPR spacer arrays, which are known to be highly diverse, contain semi-palindromic repeats which form secondary structure, and can be difficult to amplify. Cell capture, lysis, and genome amplification on a microfluidic device have been optimized, setting a stage for further investigations of individual cyanobacterial cells isolated directly from natural populations.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCyanobacteriaGenetic VariationGenomicsLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMetagenomicsSequence Analysis, DNASingle-Cell AnalysisSynechococcusCRISPRCyanobacteriaMicrofluidicsMultiple displacement amplification (MDA)Single cellWhole genome amplification (WGA)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.