Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25515574›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2014

The penny pusher: a cellular model of lens growth.

Yanrong Shi, Alicia De Maria, Snježana Lubura, Hrvoje Šikić, Steven Bassnett

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modeling Cataract Surgery in Mice.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Zinn's zonule.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2021
    Review
  18. Heterozygous Loss of Yap1 in Mice Causes Progressive Cataracts.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanrong ShiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.
Alicia De MariaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.
Snježana LuburaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Hrvoje ŠikićDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Steven BassnettDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.
University of Zagreb · HR

Funding

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER VISION RESEARCHP30EY002687 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Philip Andrew Ruzycki · 1985 to 2026
$18.4M
FIBER CELL FORMATION IN NORMAL AND CATARACTOUS LENSESR01EY009852 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BASSNETT, STEVEN · 1992 to 2021
$7.8M
Role of Microfibrils in the Biology and Pathology of the EyeR01EY024607 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BASSNETT, STEVEN · 2014 to 2016
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS EY024607NEI NIH HHS EY09852NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002687NEI NIH HHS P30 EY02687NEI NIH HHS R01 EY009852NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe mechanisms that regulate the number of cells in the lens and, therefore, its size and shape are unknown. We examined the dynamic relationship between proliferative behavior in the epithelial layer and macroscopic lens growth.

methodsThe distribution of S-phase cells across the epithelium was visualized by confocal microscopy and cell populations were determined from orthographic projections of the lens surface.

resultsThe number of S-phase cells in the mouse lens epithelium fell exponentially, to an asymptotic value of approximately 200 cells by 6 months. Mitosis became increasingly restricted to a 300-μm-wide swath of equatorial epithelium, the germinative zone (GZ), within which two peaks in labeling index were detected. Postnatally, the cell population increased to approximately 50,000 cells at 4 weeks of age. Thereafter, the number of cells declined, despite continued growth in lens dimensions. This apparently paradoxical observation was explained by a time-dependent increase in the surface area of cells at all locations. The cell biological measurements were incorporated into a physical model, the Penny Pusher. In this simple model, cells were considered to be of a single type, the proliferative behavior of which depended solely on latitude. Simulations using the Penny Pusher predicted the emergence of cell clones and were in good agreement with data obtained from earlier lineage-tracing studies.

conclusionsThe Penny Pusher, a simple stochastic model, offers a useful conceptual framework for the investigation of lens growth mechanisms and provides a plausible alternative to growth models that postulate the existence of lens stem cells.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCell EnlargementCell ProliferationCells, CulturedEpithelial CellsLens, CrystallineMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, Confocalepitheliumgrowthmodel

Identifiers

PMID25515574
PMCPMC4313793
OpenAlexW2317805557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.