Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25515527›Full record

Trial reportPsychological science2015

Dietary self-control is related to the speed with which attributes of healthfulness and tastiness are processed.

Nicolette Sullivan, Cendri Hutcherson, Alison Harris, Antonio Rangel

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychological science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Continuous track paths reveal additive evidence integration in multistep decision making.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The temporal dynamics of self-control.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Trembling Hand Unraveled: Motor Dynamics and Choice Inconsistency.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicolette SullivanDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology Computation and Neural Systems, California Institute of Technology nsulliva@caltech.edu.
Cendri HutchersonDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology.
Alison HarrisDepartment of Psychology, Claremont McKenna College.
Antonio RangelDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology Computation and Neural Systems, California Institute of Technology.

Funding

The Neurobiology of Social Decision-Making: Social Inference and ContextP50MH094258 · NIMH · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI O'DOHERTY, JOHN P · 2012 to 2021
$18.6M
Changes in the self-control circuitry across the life-cycleR21AG038866 · NIA · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI RANGEL, ANTONIO · 2011 to 2012
$347k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG038866NIA NIH HHS R21-AG038866-01NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH094258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose that self-control failures, and variation across individuals in self-control abilities, are partly due to differences in the speed with which the decision-making circuitry processes basic attributes, such as tastiness, versus more abstract attributes, such as healthfulness. We tested these hypotheses by combining a dietary-choice task with a novel form of mouse tracking that allowed us to pinpoint when different attributes were being integrated into the choice process with temporal resolution at the millisecond level. We found that, on average, tastiness was processed about 195 ms earlier than healthfulness during the choice process. We also found that 13% to 39% of observed individual differences in self-control ability could be explained by differences in the relative speed with which tastiness and healthfulness were processed.

Indexed as

Food PreferencesSelf-ControlTaste PerceptionAnimalsChoice BehaviorDecision MakingFemaleFood QualityHumansIndividualityMaleMiceModels, Animaldecision makingdelay of gratificationfoodindividual differencesopen dataopen materialsself-control

Identifiers

PMID25515527
PMCPMC4372728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.