ArticleHNO2015
[Clinical otorhinolaryngological symptoms of metamizole-induced agranulocytosis].
Article in HNO, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Dipyrone (metamizole) : Considerations on monitoring for early detection of agranulocytosis].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the controversial international debate on the use of metamizole as a standard analgesic, the prescription figures for Germany have increased constantly during recent years. However, metamizole can lead to the rare and severe medical condition called agranulocytosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween January 2009 and January 2014, 5 patients with metamizole-induced agranulocytosis presented themselves at the Interdisciplinary Emergency Center of the University Clinic Bonn. According to their leading ENT symptoms, they were transferred to the otorhinolaryngological department. We retrospectively evaluated metamizole medication, all general patient data and previous diseases, as well as disease course and the respective therapies.
resultsWithin the scope of the different treatments--surgery after trauma (n=2), elective orthopedic surgery (n=2), tonsillitis treatment (n=1)--the patients (n=5; mean age 30 years) had made regular ambulant use of metamizole for several days or weeks (4-28 days, mean 16.8 days). Daily oral dose ranged from 625 to 2000 mg/d (mean 1500 mg/d). Subsequently, patients required treatment for clinical symptoms of agranulocytosis (e.g. tonsillitis with severe odynophagia and significantly reduced general condition). All patients were monitored in an intermediate or intensive care unit (3-14 days, mean 10 days). No patients died. DISCUSSION: As our cases show, when using metamizole as a standard analgesic, the treating otolaryngologist should look for clinical symptoms of agranulocytosis and inform patients about possible adverse effects. We recommend strict indication setting, regular blood analyses during long-term medication and consideration of alternative analgesics (e.g. NSAR).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.