Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25515103›Full record

Trial reportSleep2015

Targeted Memory Reactivation during Sleep Depends on Prior Learning.

Jessica D Creery, Delphine Oudiette, James W Antony, Ken A Paller

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sleep, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Aversive memories can be weakened during human sleep via the reactivation of positive interfering memories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica D CreeryDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Delphine OudietteDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
James W AntonyInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Ken A PallerDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

Funding

PREDOCTORAL AND POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN AGING AND DEMENTIAT32AG020506 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ROBERT J VASSAR, SANDRA WEINTRAUB · 2002 to 2026
$9.9M
SYNAPTIC SUBSTRATES OF AGE-DEPENDENT MEMORY DEFICITSR01AG017139 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DISTERHOFT, JOHN F · 1999 to 2013
$4.6M
Multivariate Pattern Analysis and Memory Reactivation During SleepF31MH100958 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI ANTONY, JAMES W · 2013 to 2015
$41k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017139NIA NIH HHS T32 AG020506NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH100958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesWhen sounds associated with learning are presented again during slow-wave sleep, targeted memory reactivation (TMR) can produce improvements in subsequent location recall. Here we used TMR to investigate memory consolidation during an afternoon nap as a function of prior learning.

participantsTwenty healthy individuals (8 male, 19-23 y old). MEASUREMENTS AND

resultsParticipants learned to associate each of 50 common objects with a unique screen location. When each object appeared, its characteristic sound was played. After electroencephalography (EEG) electrodes were applied, location recall was assessed for each object, followed by a 90-min interval for sleep. During EEG-verified slow-wave sleep, half of the sounds were quietly presented over white noise. Recall was assessed 3 h after initial learning. A beneficial effect of TMR was found in the form of higher recall accuracy for cued objects compared to uncued objects when pre-sleep accuracy was used as an explanatory variable. An analysis of individual differences revealed that this benefit was greater for participants with higher pre-sleep recall accuracy. In an analysis for individual objects, cueing benefits were apparent as long as initial recall was not highly accurate. Sleep physiology analyses revealed that the cueing benefit correlated with delta power and fast spindle density.

conclusionsThese findings substantiate the use of targeted memory reactivation (TMR) methods for manipulating consolidation during sleep. TMR can selectively strengthen memory storage for object-location associations learned prior to sleep, except for those near-perfectly memorized. Neural measures found in conjunction with TMR-induced strengthening provide additional evidence about mechanisms of sleep consolidation.

Indexed as

CuesDelta RhythmElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansIndividualityLearningMaleMental RecallSleepSoundTime FactorsYoung Adultconsolidationmemory reactivationreactivationsleep spindlesslow-wave sleep

Identifiers

PMID25515103
PMCPMC4402655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.