Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25515100›Full record

ArticleSleep2015

Psychomotor vigilance task performance during and following chronic sleep restriction in rats.

Samuel Deurveilher, Jacquelyn E Bush, Benjamin Rusak, Gail A Eskes, Kazue Semba

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Disrupted Sleep: From Molecules to Cognition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel DeurveilherDepartments of Medical Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Jacquelyn E BushDepartments of Medical Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Benjamin RusakPsychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Gail A EskesPsychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Kazue SembaDepartments of Medical Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-259183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesChronic sleep restriction (CSR) impairs sustained attention in humans, as commonly assessed with the psychomotor vigilance task (PVT). To further investigate the mechanisms underlying performance deficits during CSR, we examined the effect of CSR on performance on a rat version of PVT (rPVT).

designAdult male rats were trained on a rPVT that required them to press a bar when they detected irregularly presented, brief light stimuli, and were then tested during CSR. CSR consisted of 100 or 148 h of continuous cycles of 3-h sleep deprivation (using slowly rotating wheels) alternating with a 1-h sleep opportunity (3/1 protocol). MEASUREMENTS AND

resultsAfter 28 h of CSR, the latency of correct responses and the percentages of lapses and omissions increased, whereas the percentage of correct responses decreased. Over 52-148 h of CSR, all performance measures showed partial or nearly complete recovery, and were at baseline levels on the first or second day after CSR. There were large interindividual differences in the magnitude of performance impairment during CSR, suggesting differential vulnerability to the effects of sleep loss. Wheel-running controls showed no changes in performance.

conclusionsA 28-h period of the 3/1 chronic sleep restriction (CSR) protocol disrupted performance on a sustained attention task in rats, as sleep deprivation does in humans. Performance improved after longer periods of CSR, suggesting allostatic adaptation, contrary to some reports of progressive deterioration in psychomotor vigilance task performance during CSR in humans. However, as observed in humans, there were individual differences among rats in the vulnerability of their attention performance to CSR.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsAttentionHumansIndividualityMaleModels, AnimalPsychomotor PerformanceRatsSleepSleep DeprivationTask Performance and AnalysisTime FactorsWakefulnessindividual differencesneurobehavioral impairmentPVTrecoverysleep deprivationsustained attentionvigilance

Identifiers

PMID25515100
PMCPMC4355891
OpenAlexW2065089075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.