ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2015
The neonatal sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (SERCA1b): a neglected pump in scope.
Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of Skeletal Muscle Regeneration Revealed a Novel Growth Network Induced by Molecular Acupuncture-like Transfection.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- The Meeting of Micropeptides with Major CaMembranes · 2023Review
- Follistatin treatment suppresses SERCA1b levels independently of other players of calcium homeostasis in C2C12 myotubes.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neonatal isoform of the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) ATPase (SERCA1b) is formed by developmental splicing and expressed fully only in developing muscle. As a major Ca(2+) pump in myotubes, SERCA1b must be detected in excitation contraction coupling or in store-operated calcium entry. The available pan SERCA1 antibodies also recognise SERCA1b but these are more frequently used to detect SERCA1a, the adult muscle-specific isoform characteristically expressed in fast fibres of skeletal muscle. In such applications, the pan SERCA1 antibodies are frequently claimed to be SERCA1a antibodies without proving it. Realistically, such an antibody cannot be made since it should recognise a single glycine at the C-terminal, the only part of SERCA1a that is different from SERCA1b. The false interpretation of the antibody specificity created inconsistence in the literature and led to false conclusions attributing features only to SERCA1a although those at least are also shared by SERCA1b. In contrast, a SERCA1b antibody has been made against the eight amino acid peptide tail that replaces the glycine of SERCA1a at the C-terminal. Therefore, the expression of SERCA1b can be specifically demonstrated, unlike that of SERCA1a, in various stages and conditions of skeletal muscle. This review argues against misbeliefs related to the distinction, expressions and functions of the two muscle-specific SERCA1 isoforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.