Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25515038›Full record

ArticleHealth care management science2015

An examination of competition and efficiency for hospital industry in Turkey.

Hacer Özgen Narcı, Yasar A Ozcan, İsmet Şahin, Menderes Tarcan, Mustafa Narcı

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Literature Review of Efficiency Measurement in Nursing Homes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Identifying and prioritizing inefficiency causes in Iran's health system.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Does competition improve hospital performance: a DEA based evaluation from the Netherlands.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Perceived Competition and Process of Care in Rural China.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hacer Özgen NarcıDepartment of Health Management, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey. hnarci@medipol.edu.tr.
Yasar A OzcanDepartment of Health Administration, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. ozcan@vcu.edu.
İsmet ŞahinDepartment of Healthcare Management, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. isahin@hacettepe.edu.tr.
Menderes TarcanDepartment of Healthcare Management, Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey. mtarcan@ogu.edu.tr.
Mustafa NarcıBahceli Sok. Berat Apt. No: 15/18, Sahrayıcedit-İstanbul, Turkey. narcimustafa@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The two particular reforms that have been undertaken under the Health Transformation Program in Turkey are enhancing efficiency and increasing competition. However, there is a lack of information about the relationship between competition and hospital efficiency. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effect of competition on technical efficiency for the hospital industry in Turkey. The target population included all public and private general hospitals that were open in 2010 in Turkey (n = 1,224). From these, 1,103 hospitals met the selection criteria and were included in the study. Data were obtained from the Turkish Statistical Institute, the Ministry of Health, and through a field survey. Technical efficiency of hospitals was estimated using Data Envelopment Analysis with five outputs and five inputs. The intensity of competition among hospitals was measured by objective and subjective measures. Objective competition was measured using the Hirschman-Herfindahl Index, and subjective competition was measured based on the perceptions of top level hospital managers. Multivariate Tobit regression was used to investigate the relationship between competition and efficiency while controlling the effects of demand and supply characteristics of the market and the hospital traits. Efficiency results showed that 17% of hospitals were technically efficient. Regression analyses portrayed that the degree of competition among general hospitals did not have a statistically significant relationship with hospitals' technical efficiency. To conclude, hospital efficiency in Turkey does not seem to be affected by the intensity of competition among hospitals.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalCross-Sectional StudiesEconomic CompetitionEconomics, HospitalHealth Services ResearchHospital AdministrationHospitalsHospitals, GeneralHumansMultivariate AnalysisTurkeyHospital competitionHospital efficiencyPerceived competitionTurkey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.