Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25514747›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2014

Time course study of blood pressure in term and preterm infants immediately after birth.

Gerhard Pichler, Po-Yin Cheung, Corinna Binder, Megan O'Reilly, Bernhard Schwaberger, Khalid Aziz, Berndt Urlesberger, Georg M Schmölzer

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Monitoring and evaluation of hypotension in the extremely preterm.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Empirical estimation of the normative blood pressure in infants <28 weeks gestation using a massive data approach.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerhard PichlerCentre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Neonatal Research Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University, Graz, Austria.
Po-Yin CheungCentre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Neonatal Research Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Corinna BinderDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University, Graz, Austria.
Megan O'ReillyCentre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Neonatal Research Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Bernhard SchwabergerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University, Graz, Austria.
Khalid AzizCentre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Neonatal Research Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Berndt UrlesbergerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University, Graz, Austria.
Georg M SchmölzerCentre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Neonatal Research Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University, Graz, Austria.
Medical University of Graz · ATRoyal Alexandra Hospital · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe temporal changes in systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure (SBP, DBP, and MBP, respectively) in term and preterm infants immediately after birth.

methodsProspective observational two-center study. In term infants SBP, DBP, and MBP were assessed non-invasively every minute for the first 15 minutes, and in preterm infants every minute for the first 15 minutes, as well as at 20, 25, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after birth. Regression analyses were performed by gender and respiratory support in all neonates; and by mode of delivery, cord clamping time, and development of ultrasound-detected brain injury in preterm neonates.

resultsTerm infants (n = 54) had a mean (SD) birth weight of 3298 (442) g and gestational age of 38 (1) weeks, and preterm infants (n = 94) weighed 1340 (672) g and were 30 (3) weeks gestation. Term infants' SBP, DBP and MBP within the first 15 minutes after birth were independent of gender or respiratory support. Linear mixed regression analysis showed that preterm infants, who were female, born vaginally, had delayed cord clamping and did not require positive pressure ventilation nor develop periventricular injury or ventriculomegaly, had significantly higher SBP, DBP, and MBP at some measurement points within the first hour after birth.

conclusionsWe present novel reference ranges of BP immediately after birth in a cohort of term and preterm neonates. They may aid in optimization of cardiovascular support during early transition at all gestations.

Indexed as

Blood PressureFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePremature BirthProspective StudiesRegression AnalysisSex FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25514747
PMCPMC4267788
OpenAlexW2042559189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.