Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25514634›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Proangiogenic compositions of microvesicles derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells.

Jianying Chen, Zhenjun Liu, Mian Ming Hong, Hongzhe Zhang, Can Chen, Mengyuan Xiao, Junxian Wang, Feng Yao, Mingchuan Ba, Jinghu Liu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells for treating osteoarthritis of the knee: a single-arm, open-label study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2020
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. hUMSC vs. hUMSC-Exosome: Which One Is Better for Epilepsy?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jianying ChenDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Zhenjun LiuDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Mian Ming HongDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Hongzhe ZhangDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Can ChenDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Mengyuan XiaoDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Junxian WangDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Feng YaoDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Mingchuan BaDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Jinghu LiuDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Zi-Kuan GuoDepartment of Experimental Hematology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jixin ZhongDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Guangdong Medical College · CNUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION &

objectiveMicrovesicles (MVs) derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been shown to promote angiogenesis. This study was aimed to shed a light on the mechanisms by analyzing the angiogenesis-promoting compositions of MSC-MVs. Also we try to figure out the impact of hypoxia on angiogenesis.

methodsMVs were isolated from the culture supernatants of MSCs under hypoxia/normoxia and serum-deprivation condition. The morphological features of MVs were revealed by an electron microscope and the origin of the MVs was identified by a bead-bound assay. An antibody array was used to analyze the expression of angiogenic cytokines from MVs and the parent MSCs as well. The major candidate factors were screened and the results were validated by immune blotting.

resultsMSC-MVs were around 80 nm in diameter. They expressed CD29, CD44, and CD73, but not CD31 and CD45. Antibody array showed that both MSCs and MVs expressed many angiogenesis-promoting biomolecules, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), basic fibroblast growth factors (bFGF), and recptor of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (UPAR). MSC-MVs contained angiogenin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and the receptor-2 for vascular endothelial growth factor at higher levels than the parent MSCs. Under hypoxic condition most cytokines were expressed in greater quantity than normoxic in MSCs while in MVs there was no significant difference between hypoxic and normoxic conditions except UPAR, Angiogenin, VEGF, IGF, Tie-2/TEK, and IL-6 which were higher in MVs under hypoxic conditions than those in normoxic condition.

conclusionUpon serum-deprivation condition, MSCs could secrete MVs that contain a variety of factors contributing to their angiogenesis-promoting function. And among them, Angiogenin, VEGF, MCP-1, VEGF R2 might be of greater importance than the other cytokines. Also UPAR, Angiogenin, VEGF, IGF, Tie-2/TEK, IL-6 might be responsible for hypoxia-augmented proangiogenic effects of MVs.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceBlotting, WesternChemokine CCL2CytokinesHumansHypoxiaMesenchymal Stem CellsMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMicrovesselsNeovascularization, PhysiologicRibonuclease, PancreaticUmbilical CordVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AangiogeninCCL2 protein, humanChemokine CCL2CytokinesRibonuclease, PancreaticVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25514634
PMCPMC4267846
OpenAlexW1991760073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.