Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25514380›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2015

Imaging tumour hypoxia with positron emission tomography.

I N Fleming, R Manavaki, P J Blower, C West, K J Williams, A L Harris, J Domarkas, S Lord, C Baldry, F J Gilbert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 167 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Pharmacokinetic Analysis of DynamicJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2017
    Trial
  5. Multimodal Imaging of Hypoxia, Metabolism and pH in Feline Sarcoma Using HyperpolarizedAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Molecular Imaging in Photon Radiotherapy.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Use of Radiomics in Characterizing Tumor Hypoxia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. JACS Au · 2024
    Article
  20. Exploiting bacteria for cancer immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024
    Review

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

I N FlemingAberdeen Biomedical Imaging Centre, Lilian Sutton Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.
R ManavakiDepartment of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 218-Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
P J BlowerDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, 4th Floor, Lambeth Wing, London SE1 7EH, UK.
C WestManchester Academic Health Science Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
K J Williams1] Manchester Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK [2] EPSRC and CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre in Cambridge and Manchester, Cambridge, UK.
A L HarrisMolecular Oncology Laboratories, University Department of Medical Oncology, The Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.
J DomarkasCentre for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Respiratory Medicine, Hull-York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull HU16 5JQ, UK.
S LordMolecular Oncology Laboratories, University Department of Medical Oncology, The Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.
C BaldryDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, 4th Floor, Lambeth Wing, London SE1 7EH, UK.
F J Gilbert1] Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 218-Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK [2] EPSRC and CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre in Cambridge and Manchester, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11359Cancer Research UK 16465Cancer Research UK 16466Cancer Research UK 18097Cancer Research UK 18974Chief Scientist OfficeDepartment of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypoxia, a hallmark of most solid tumours, is a negative prognostic factor due to its association with an aggressive tumour phenotype and therapeutic resistance. Given its prominent role in oncology, accurate detection of hypoxia is important, as it impacts on prognosis and could influence treatment planning. A variety of approaches have been explored over the years for detecting and monitoring changes in hypoxia in tumours, including biological markers and noninvasive imaging techniques. Positron emission tomography (PET) is the preferred method for imaging tumour hypoxia due to its high specificity and sensitivity to probe physiological processes in vivo, as well as the ability to provide information about intracellular oxygenation levels. This review provides an overview of imaging hypoxia with PET, with an emphasis on the advantages and limitations of the currently available hypoxia radiotracers.

Indexed as

Cell HypoxiaHumansNeoplasmsNitroimidazolesPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedNitroimidazolesRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID25514380
PMCPMC4453462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.