Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25514344›Full record

ArticleStem cell research2015

Transcriptome analysis of chicken ES, blastodermal and germ cells reveals that chick ES cells are equivalent to mouse ES cells rather than EpiSC.

Christian Jean, Nidia M M Oliveira, Sittipon Intarapat, Aurélie Fuet, Clément Mazoyer, Irene De Almeida, Katherine Trevers, Sharon Boast, Pauline Aubel, Federica Bertocchini and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Avian Embryonic Culture: A Perspective ofFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mammalian germ cells are determined after PGC colonization of the nascent gonad.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christian JeanINSERM, U846, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute, Bron, France; INRA, USC1361, Bron, France; Université de Lyon, Lyon 1, UMR S 846, Lyon, France.
Nidia M M OliveiraDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.
Sittipon IntarapatDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.
Aurélie FuetINSERM, U846, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute, Bron, France; INRA, USC1361, Bron, France; Université de Lyon, Lyon 1, UMR S 846, Lyon, France.
Clément MazoyerINSERM, U846, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute, Bron, France; INRA, USC1361, Bron, France; Université de Lyon, Lyon 1, UMR S 846, Lyon, France.
Irene De AlmeidaDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.
Katherine TreversDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.
Sharon BoastDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.
Pauline AubelINSERM, U846, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute, Bron, France; INRA, USC1361, Bron, France; Université de Lyon, Lyon 1, UMR S 846, Lyon, France.
Federica BertocchiniDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.
Claudio D SternDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.
Bertrand PainINSERM, U846, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute, Bron, France; INRA, USC1361, Bron, France; Université de Lyon, Lyon 1, UMR S 846, Lyon, France. Electronic address: bertrand.pain@inserm.fr.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K007742/1Medical Research Council G0400559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pluripotent Embryonic Stem cell (ESC) lines can be derived from a variety of sources. Mouse lines derived from the early blastocyst and from primordial germ cells (PGCs) can contribute to all somatic lineages and to the germ line, whereas cells from slightly later embryos (EpiSC) no longer contribute to the germ line. In chick, pluripotent ESCs can be obtained from PGCs and from early blastoderms. Established PGC lines and freshly isolated blastodermal cells (cBC) can contribute to both germinal and somatic lineages but established lines from the former (cESC) can only produce somatic cell types. For this reason, cESCs are often considered to be equivalent to mouse EpiSC. To define these cell types more rigorously, we have performed comparative microarray analysis to describe a transcriptomic profile specific for each cell type. This is validated by real time RT-PCR and in situ hybridisation. We find that both cES and cBC cells express classic pluripotency-related genes (including cPOUV/OCT4, NANOG, SOX2/3, KLF2 and SALL4), whereas expression of DAZL, DND1, DDX4 and PIWIL1 defines a molecular signature for germ cells. Surprisingly, contrary to the prevailing view, our results also suggest that cES cells resemble mouse ES cells more closely than mouse EpiSC.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAnimalsArgonaute ProteinsBlastocystCells, CulturedChickensCluster AnalysisDEAD-box RNA HelicasesEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic Stem CellsGerm CellsIn Situ HybridizationMiceNeoplasm ProteinsPrincipal Component AnalysisRNA-Binding ProteinsArgonaute ProteinsDAZL protein, mouseDdx4 protein, mouseDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDnd1 protein, mouseNeoplasm ProteinsPiwil1 protein, mouseRNA-Binding ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25514344
PMCPMC4305369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.