Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25513776›Full record

ReviewVirulence2014

Proteomics of effector-triggered immunity (ETI) in plants.

Brenden Hurley, Rajagopal Subramaniam, David S Guttman, Darrell Desveaux

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virulence, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. iTRAQ based proteomic analysis of rice lines having single or stacked blast resistance genes:Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pathogens.Virulence · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brenden Hurleya Department of Cell & Systems Biology; University of Toronto; Toronto, ON Canada.
Rajagopal Subramaniam
David S Guttman
Darrell Desveaux

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effector-triggered immunity (ETI) was originally termed gene-for-gene resistance and dates back to fundamental observations of flax resistance to rust fungi by Harold Henry Flor in the 1940s. Since then, genetic and biochemical approaches have defined our current understanding of how plant "resistance" proteins recognize microbial effectors. More recently, proteomic approaches have expanded our view of the protein landscape during ETI and contributed significant advances to our mechanistic understanding of ETI signaling. Here we provide an overview of proteomic techniques that have been used to study plant ETI including both global and targeted approaches. We discuss the challenges associated with ETI proteomics and highlight specific examples from the literature, which demonstrate how proteomics is advancing the ETI research field.

Indexed as

Plant ImmunityProteomicsBacterial ProteinsMutationPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsPlantsPseudomonas syringaeBacterial ProteinsPlant ProteinsEffector-Triggered ImmunityNB-LRR proteinsProteomicsPseudomonas syringaeType III effector

Identifiers

PMID25513776
PMCPMC4189881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.