Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25513760›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2014

Toward Spatially Regulated Division of Protocells: Insights into the E. coli Min System from in Vitro Studies.

Simon Kretschmer, Petra Schwille

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Analysis of the intrinsic value of life in the context of synthetic biology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Progress in synthesizing protocells.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2019
    Review
  5. Reverse and forward engineering of protein pattern formation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  6. Artificial cell mimics as simplified models for the study of cell biology.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2017
    Review
  7. The Blueprint of a Minimal Cell: MiniBacillus.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2016
    Review
  8. Supramolecular structure in the membrane of Staphylococcus aureus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Simon KretschmerDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, Martinsried 82152, Germany. kretschmer@biochem.mpg.de.
Petra SchwilleDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, Martinsried 82152, Germany. schwille@biochem.mpg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For reconstruction of controlled cell division in a minimal cell model, or protocell, a positioning mechanism that spatially regulates division is indispensable. In Escherichia coli, the Min proteins oscillate from pole to pole to determine the division site by inhibition of the primary divisome protein FtsZ anywhere but in the cell middle. Remarkably, when reconstituted under defined conditions in vitro, the Min proteins self-organize into spatiotemporal patterns in the presence of a lipid membrane and ATP. We review recent progress made in studying the Min system in vitro, particularly focusing on the effects of various physicochemical parameters and boundary conditions on pattern formation. Furthermore, we discuss implications and challenges for utilizing the Min system for division site placement in protocells.

Identifiers

PMID25513760
PMCPMC4284474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.