Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25512878›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2014

Self-reported attitudes versus actual practice of oxygen therapy by ICU physicians and nurses.

Hendrik Jf Helmerhorst, Marcus J Schultz, Peter Hj van der Voort, Robert J Bosman, Nicole P Juffermans, Evert de Jonge, David J van Westerloo

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04534959 phase3active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Strategy to Avoid Excessive Oxygen for Critically Ill Trauma Patients (SAVE-O2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2020 to 2025Enrolled6,000ConditionsCritical Illness, Wounds and Injury, Disease Attributes, Pathologic ProcessesArmsTargeting Normoxemia (SpO2 90-96%, PaO2 60-100 mmHg)
NCT04534972 phase3active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Strategy to Avoid Excessive Oxygen in Major Burn Patients (SAVE-O2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2021 to 2025Enrolled2,000ConditionsCritical Illness, Wounds and Injury, Disease Attributes, Pathologic ProcessesArmsTargeting Normoxemia (SpO2 90-96%, PaO2 60-100 mmHg)
NCT06501118 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Optimizing Care in Critically Ill at UCHealth by Liberalizing the Target O2 in Mechanically-ventilated ICU Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2024 to 2026Enrolled3,600ConditionsRespiratory Failure, Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure, Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, HypoxemiaArmsEducation, Epic notification alert
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Manual compared to automated closed-loop oxygen control strategies in hospitalised adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Oxygen as an Essential Medicine.Critical care clinics · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Modeling current practices in critical care comparative effectiveness research.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hendrik Jf HelmerhorstDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2300, RC, The Netherlands ; Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam 1105, AZ, The Netherlands.
Marcus J SchultzLaboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam 1105, AZ, The Netherlands ; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam 1105, AZ, The Netherlands.
Peter Hj van der VoortDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam 1091, AC, The Netherlands.
Robert J BosmanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam 1091, AC, The Netherlands.
Nicole P JuffermansLaboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam 1105, AZ, The Netherlands ; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam 1105, AZ, The Netherlands.
Evert de JongeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2300, RC, The Netherlands.
David J van WesterlooDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2300, RC, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLOLVG · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh inspiratory oxygen concentrations are frequently administered in ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) but may induce lung injury and systemic toxicity. We compared beliefs and actual clinical practice regarding oxygen therapy in critically ill patients.

methodsIn three large teaching hospitals in the Netherlands, ICU physicians and nurses were invited to complete a questionnaire about oxygen therapy. Furthermore, arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis data and ventilator settings were retrieved to assess actual oxygen practice in the same hospitals 1 year prior to the survey.

resultsIn total, 59% of the 215 respondents believed that oxygen-induced lung injury is a concern. The majority of physicians and nurses stated that minimal acceptable oxygen saturation and partial arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2) ranges were 85% to 95% and 7 to 10 kPa (52.5 to 75 mmHg), respectively. Analysis of 107,888 ABG results with concurrent ventilator settings, derived from 5,565 patient admissions, showed a median (interquartile range (IQR)) PaO2 of 11.7 kPa (9.9 to 14.3) [87.8 mmHg], median fractions of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 0.4 (0.4 to 0.5), and median positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 (5 to 8) cm H2O. Of all PaO2 values, 73% were higher than the upper limit of the commonly self-reported acceptable range, and in 58% of these cases, neither FiO2 nor PEEP levels were lowered until the next ABG sample was taken.

conclusionsMost ICU clinicians acknowledge the potential adverse effects of prolonged exposure to hyperoxia and report a low tolerance for high oxygen levels. However, in actual clinical practice, a large proportion of their ICU patients was exposed to higher arterial oxygen levels than self-reported target ranges.

Indexed as

HyperoxiaIntensive care medicineLung injuryMechanical ventilationOxygenQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID25512878
PMCPMC4240734
OpenAlexW2134037175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.