Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25512841›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2014

Top-down effects of a lytic bacteriophage and protozoa on bacteria in aqueous and biofilm phases.

Ji Zhang, Anni-Maria Ormälä-Odegrip, Johanna Mappes, Jouni Laakso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Microbial warfare in the wild-the impact of protists on the evolution and virulence of bacterial pathogens.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ji ZhangCentre of Excellence in Biological Interactions, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland ; Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki P.O. Box 65, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Anni-Maria Ormälä-OdegripCentre of Excellence in Biological Interactions, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland ; Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki P.O. Box 65, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Johanna MappesCentre of Excellence in Biological Interactions, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Jouni LaaksoCentre of Excellence in Biological Interactions, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland ; Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki P.O. Box 65, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lytic bacteriophages and protozoan predators are the major causes of bacterial mortality in natural microbial communities, which also makes them potential candidates for biological control of bacterial pathogens. However, little is known about the relative impact of bacteriophages and protozoa on the dynamics of bacterial biomass in aqueous and biofilm phases. Here, we studied the temporal and spatial dynamics of bacterial biomass in a microcosm experiment where opportunistic pathogenic bacteria Serratia marcescens was exposed to particle-feeding ciliates, surface-feeding amoebas, and lytic bacteriophages for 8 weeks, ca. 1300 generations. We found that ciliates were the most efficient enemy type in reducing bacterial biomass in the open water, but least efficient in reducing the biofilm biomass. Biofilm was rather resistant against bacterivores, but amoebae had a significant long-term negative effect on bacterial biomass both in the open-water phase and biofilm. Bacteriophages had only a minor long-term effect on bacterial biomass in open-water and biofilm phases. However, separate short-term experiments with the ancestral bacteriophages and bacteria revealed that bacteriophages crash the bacterial biomass dramatically in the open-water phase within the first 24 h. Thereafter, the bacteria evolve phage-resistance that largely prevents top-down effects. The combination of all three enemy types was most effective in reducing biofilm biomass, whereas in the open-water phase the ciliates dominated the trophic effects. Our results highlight the importance of enemy feeding mode on determining the spatial distribution and abundance of bacterial biomass. Moreover, the enemy type can be crucially important predictor of whether the rapid defense evolution can significantly affect top-down regulation of bacteria.

Indexed as

Acanthamoeba castellaniiaquatic bacteriadefense evolutionlytic bacteriophagemicrocosmSemad11Serratia marcescensDb11Tetrahymena thermophilatop-down regulation

Identifiers

PMID25512841
PMCPMC4264894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.